Search results

You still have a lot to learn... I have been quoting to you (word for word) about not one stone left standing in Jerusalem, and reading Matthew 24 in an Biblically insular fashion. But the fact is, we cannot read scripture in a vacuum where there is nothing acceptable as truth except our own...

Again like I said, sounds more like a classic case of “I don’t like what I’m hearing, so I’ll just dismiss it by accusing TribulationSigns of making everything 'virtual." Convenient, isn’t it? Hint: You are confused about the difference between symbolic and virtual. The Bible uses vivid...

Good example for those who are spiritually blind. Yeah... The Pharisees and scribes thought so, too. Talking about spiritual blindness! hlf

It is not about being smarter. It's about being able to discern what God's Word is talking about. And I do not think you are as smart as you think to begin with. Please reconsider carefully: Heb 9:15-17 (15) And for this cause he is the mediator of the New Testament, that by means of...

Wow, thanks for the Bible 101 refresher—Matthew 12:30, got it. But let’s slow down before you start assigning “childish” labels and dispensing theological pop quizzes. The idea that everyone’s either saved or lost with no nuance is a nice, neat little box—but sadly, the Bible doesn’t always play...

You need to read again, "And we know that this Prince Confirms [gabar], a Hebrew word which actually is Strengthened, the Covenant after these 62 weeks. Therefore, the final week cannot start until Christ is cut Off FIRST! Not when Christ was baptized!" How does this suddenly turn into...

LOL. Says the one recycling the same warped preterism-inspired interpretation on loop. Daniel’s “people” weren’t just ethnic Jews—they were the whole congregation of Israel: Old Testament Israel, then New Testament Israel, the Church. All six points in Daniel 9:24 apply to them. End of story...

Again false! Dan 9:26-27 (26) And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are...

False. The studies, like yours, out there dripping with speculation of when this Covenant is confirmed. For we 'must' let the Bible itself tell us what it means. We know From the context (after the 62 weeks) that it starts after the cross, after Messiah the Prince is 'Cut Off.' And we know...

Say one who cannot gainsay or resist. Go figures.

No, it does not. False. The baptism was not the confirmation of a covenant. Water does not confirm a covenant — it is the blood of Christ that does. Heb 9:14-17 (14) How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your...

That is crazy speculation. God is not talking about power outrage or "new mutation" here. Crazy. No. The five months are not something God wants us to count with a calendar marked by some physical event on Earth. This is not what GOd is talking about here. Let's read the Scripture...

It’s clear you’re missing the context regarding adoption, the covenants, “not all Israel which are of Israel,” the children of the promise, and the purpose of election. All of these refer to God’s eternal plan. God chose the elder to serve the younger because He had chosen Jacob for the purpose...

LOL...God is painting a spiritual picture of nations between two people. Read again: Rom 9:4-13 (4) Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; (5) Whose are the fathers, and of...

Also I believe that the Scriptures are very clear that we ALL were once children of disobedience, children of wrath, who were living in sin being hateful and unrighteous, and then we were saved and made righteous by the washing of regeneration. There's nothing false about God's Word. Titus...

Misapplication of Scripture. Nothing to do with Romans 9:13. But I will respond to this for anyone want to know: Matthew 10:34-36 "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the...

Foolish. You were the one that suggested that Paul was not "aware" of his sin before the law "as if" Paul was living sinless before the law. But you are right, Paul DID sin before the law. That does NOT mean God will not use his "pre-law" sins against him, which is another lie of the free...

No, what you believe or assume is what is falling apart. You were under the false impression that Paul lived a sinless life before He heard the law. LOL!!!!!!!!! The answer is obviously no. Paul did NOT claim to be sinless. In fact, throughout his writings, Paul acknowledges his own struggle...

LOL. This proves that you have not listened to God's Word well. Yes, God loves His chosen people and hates the non-elect. It is in the Bible! Can't find it? Let me find one for you to see if you receive the love of the Truth: Mal 1:2-3 (2) I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say...

Again, you don't get it. LOL. I knew you might come up with a false interpretation of Romans 7:7-11. So for the sake of readers, I will response this one time. Romans 7:7-11 talks about how sin is recognized through the law. Paul says, basically, “I wouldn’t have known what coveting was if...