Search results

You can take it with a grain of salt, but I'm not that much of a skeptic nor scoffer. My pastor has seen them too.

Matthew 13:15 For the hearts of this people have grown dull. Their ears are hard of hearing, And their eyes they have closed, Lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, Lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, So that I should heal them.’ Acts 28:27 For the...

When their interpretation is not only unscriptural from the whole of the New Testament, but the opposite of what is meant, that is ridiculous. Doctrines of demons should be dealt with harshly, even if you don't agree with that.

I don't need commentaries, but want to be able to recommend one that is more right than any other I've checked.

Yes, scriptures explains scripture. Also once you have been taught by the Holy Spirit for years and have learned what the scriptures mean, it is fun to see which commentaries agree with HIM. I was astonished that there was only one. The Abingdon Bible Commentary had the most correct answers. All...

Yikes. John MacArthur mocks holiness. He doesn't believe Jesus takes away our sin. Psalms 1:1, don't be among the scoffers.

It doesn't say "innocent" but have the faith (or trust) of a child. Can you say yes you have that trust and obedience rather than "innocence"? We are to be gentle as doves and wise as serpents. That's not innocence/ignorance.

Honsesty is not your cup of tea I see. I'm an open book. Nothing to hide. Christians are always ready with an answer for their beliefs. No deception.

I have it. Also Matthew Henry, and scores of others. I've been collecting them for decades. I found them ridiculous most of the time. The only one I found to be accurate to what a verse actually means is The Abingdon Bible Commentary. All the othera agreed with each other, whereas the Abingdon...

I asked what your theology is. I told you I'm neither Calvinist nor Arminian. So what are you. Be honest.

Aren't Jamieson, Fausset and brown also Reformed?

I'm neither, so what are you? Be honest.

Just the opposite. Doctrines of demons are LIBERAL. This one is Weslyn and is the basis for HOLINESS, the opposite of LIBERAL. What theology do you think is not liberal? What do you like? Reformed?

There is only one I have found that doesn't agree with all the doctrines of demons, but only what the Bible actually means, and that is The Abingdon Bible Commentary. c. 1929

Right it doesn't, but it is only one of many combined to confirm Jesus wanting us to be perfect.

Yes, It is a process. There are levels of obedience that we are accountable for to God. Those who are truly His live up to the level they are at. Philippians 3:16. But we strive to keep growing, never settling on less that perfect as we continuously walk in the Spirit. And as 1 John 1:7 says...

You are reading a weird translation. No wonder you are confused! "Husband" just means natural birth from a man's sperm. Not born of the Spirit with the seed of the Father. Here is the New King James Version 10 He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know...

Well, we must all work out our own salvation with fear and trembling. The theory that "sin is an illusion" sounds like a variation on the Gnostic teaching that sins of the flesh are not sins; the only sins are of the spirit. That will cause a Gnostic to say they have no sin, and won't discern...

You must be following some guru or something. It certainly isn't Christ. Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. 1 Peter 1:16 16 Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy. 2 Peter 1:10-11 10 Wherefore, brethren, labour the more, that by...