Search results

Are you serious??????????

Oh goodness.....What man taught you this? If Joseph and Mary were "approved" to have sexual relations, then why was Mary surprised by Gabriels announcement that she would give birth to the son of God?

I wouldn't be either..........if you or your Protestant friends could give any evidence of that Mary had any other child than Jesus....but you can't...SURPRISE!

Lol David. You are right. We are surprised that you Protestants have rejected the 2,000-year teaching of Christianity and accepted the 500-year teaching of some of the men of the Reformation. I say some of the men of the Reformation because Luther and Calvin didn't even teach what you believe...

Hey....Johann.....Are you using a quote of a 'saint' (Euthymius) from the 4th century and a bible scholar (Paul Schanz) from the 19th century to support what YOU believe? Curious Mary

Thanks Rella, I agree with your statement that 'nowhere in any bible does it say they did not come together in the marriage bed'. Just as important is the FACT that 'nowhere in any bible does it say that they DID come together in the marriage bed'. That means we have to rely on the translation...

Your point was mute because we are not disagreeing with each other on that point..... :IDK:

You never answered the question: Based on the passages from Scripture I have given you AND a historical account from 1,700 years ago (Eusebius) that accounts for those "brothers" do you still believe what your 16th century men have taught you? Curious Mary

Oh goodness Rella.....why are we going down this off the subject rabbit hole???????? The Church has not "dropped a commandment". Please give your evidence that it has! The Church does not now and has never condoned the worshiping of images! That is a Protestant lie that started AFTER the...

Yup Rella, and look at the line right after what you highlighted in red: It is not intended to say anything about the future beyond that point. So your point is mute...

Rella, "It was provable that those who wrote your bible were not 100% correct...." HUH.............???? That statement makes absolutely NO SENSE. I specifically addressed the bible passage that YOU provided. That bible passage apparntly came from people who wrote your bible so I addressed what...

hello Rella, No problem on the cutting of the quote. It's easy to find what you were quoting. And when you say 'normal marriage' I think it is safe for me to assume that you mean that her and Joseph, at a minimum, had sex.... which is what happens in a normal marriage.... even if they didn't...

:Zek:

Yup, If you cherry pick Scripture, you are right and you will never be wrong. Now I will cherry pick Scripture so that you are wrong and i am right: She was baptized, with her household” “the same hour of the night . . . the jailer was baptized, with all his family” “I did baptize also the...

Hey Johann, You are going to the wrong website if you are going to "staycatholic.com". Go to the source (The Holy See) instead of an associate of the source. You have to show me in Scripture, not the writings of your 16th century Protestant men, where it says that "sprinkling" is prohibited...

Ok....went to your profile. Couldn't find what you are talking about. Sooooo I still don't know what you believe!!

Hey Rella, Yes. I know the biblical meaning of "knew". Scripture makes it clear that Joseph did not 'know' Mary before Jesus’ birth, thus establishing the doctrine of Jesus’ virginal birth! The verse you provided showing that they did not 'know' each other before Jesus' birth does not mean...

Hi Rella, Thanks for having quotes from Scripture to support what you have been taught instead of just giving your opinion and nothing to back it up. Others on here do that and it' frustrating to have a conversation with them. It appears you are using Mark 6:3 to answer my question to...

Hi Rella, Let me see if I have your theory correct. The teaching of The Church that Mary was always a virgin and never had other children was an "error" and God waited 1,600 years to correct that error? Your 16th century time frame of God fixing that "error" suggests that God used the men of...

You are right. You never said that. However, Scripture doesn't support your opinion. And that is the subject at hand.....