Search results

I'm sorry, but I can't understand what you're trying to say here. You can try to clarify it if you want or we can just move on from this.

So, why did you tell me before that interpreting the vials in parallel with each trumpet and seal is "absurd" not long ago as you did here... Who is Paul discussing in 2 Thessalonians 2? It seemed like you cared about this then and even thought it was "absurd" to think that way. But, now...

I'm not sure if he believes any prophecy is fully fulfilled yet. This is terrible and dangerous hermeneutics to resort to this idea that every physical fulfillment of prophecy also requires a spiritual fulfillment. Where does this end? Like you said, you can make the Bible say what you want it...

LOL! Yes, let's just decide for ourselves when the prophecy has been fully fulfilled instead of accepting what the prophecy was clearly all about. Thanks again for revealing how little spiritual discernment you have. This is the most ironic thread that anyone has ever created on this forum...

He clearly was, but we'll see how he answers the question. In case Jesus's reference to "all these things" isn't clear to Him, the following makes it clear as to what Jesus was talking about... Mark 13:1 Then as He went out of the temple, one of His disciples said to Him, “Teacher, see what...

What about your own constant display of arrogance and ignorance? Saying that amills are just going by what we're told? That's arrogance and ignorance. I study the scriptures for myself like the Bereans (Acts 17:10-11). How about taking the log out of your own eye? Of course I am. There's...

No one denies the reality of Jesus being the temple in that passage, but this has no relation whatsoever to the Olivet Discourse.

LOL! Yes, things happened in Jerusalem in 70 AD just as Jesus prophesied, but that was just a coincidence, right? What is there to demonstrate? Why do you make simple things convoluted? Jesus said that Jerusalem would be surrounded and that the people in the city would be killed and that the...

Of course. Did I ever say otherwise? No. And I would say the same thing. Revelation 19 refers to Christ's second coming and Revelation 20 refers to His reign and to His followers being His priests. He started reigning after His resurrection (Matthew 28:18, Ephesians 1:19-22) and He hasn't come...

You don't have a clue. You are completely ignorant. Tell me how you can reconcile the following passages with your view... 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent...

It'd be nice if you actually debated at all instead of spewing your incoherent gibberish.

I haven't said anything about that verse. He claims that the following passage did not occur in 70 AD... Luke 19:41 Now as He drew near, He saw the city and wept over it, 42 saying, “If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are...

Which verse are you talking about?

We have discussed this in depth before when you have not addressed my arguments. You have done NOTHING to prove that Jesus was not talking about earthly Jerusalem the destruction of the temple buildings standing at that time in passages like Luke 19:41-44, Luke 21:6-7, Luke 21:20-24, Matthew...

This is such extreme childishness. You apparently have no interest in being taken seriously. Were the dead in Christ resurrected at His ascension? No. So, I guess we can't relate 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17 to Acts 1:11 then, according to your ludicrous logic.

Thank God that He is not like you and is not a respecter of persons and was willing to save the Gentiles and make Gentile believers His people together with the Jews because of the blood of Jesus with no difference between them.

So, I'll add 2 Peter 3:10-12 to the growing list of scriptures that you choose to ignore. It's getting to be quite a long list.

I have, too. He can't answer simple questions. He's frozen in fear by what his answers will reveal about his false beliefs.

What is this, scripture tag? How about you actually address what is written in 2 Peter 3:10-12? Can you manage that, buddy?

Is He the God of the Gentiles too, buddy? Can you bring yourself to acknowledge that or not? Romans 3:29 Or is He the God of the Jews only? Is He not also the God of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also,