Search results

I am dispensationalist also. I agree with Ironside, as shown in the link you gave, that ultra-dispensationalism is no good. But concerning dispensationalism, I do not think one can ever come to a complete understanding of the Scripture without understanding the dispensations God has given...

We must first understand that with God, there are no 'good' people. We view it in light of what we see in good or bad people. But you take a so called good man, and place him next to God, or next to God's Son, Jesus Christ, and there is nothing good in him. What we do know is that there is...

That is a lie straight out of hell. Jesus Christ will forever be the God/Man. He is, a physical Man at this time sitting at the right hand of God. (Heb. 10:12) He is flesh and bone, not flesh and blood. His blood has been applied to the true tabernacle in the Heavens. (Heb. 9:11-12) Stranger

And what is that? Stranger

What is your 'other faith'? Stranger

Chapter and verse. Quantrill

Chapter and verse. Stranger

So what? I just showed you were in error about what is 'perfect'. Do you acknowledge that? Of course not. You just try and divert to another rabbit trail. God's Word in Scripture has just showed you that you were wrong. Stranger

No. (1 Cor. 13:10) has nothing to do with the writing of Scripture. It has to do with the Church being brought into a mature state. The same truth is explained again in (Eph. 4:13). The word 'perfect' there is the same word. Both context's are concerning gifts in the Body of Christ. (1...

The gifts will be present in the Body of Christ till Christ takes us out of here. Stranger

Based on talking to you. Stranger

I don't know what you mean. I know more about them than you. Stranger

You mean for the gift of tongues. Stanger

I gave you Scripture that proves the purpose of tongues. You have given nothing in Scripture that is against the gift of tongues. Yet you say Scripture takes care of all your needs as you disbelieve the Scripture. Oxymoronic. Stranger

Don't know what you mean by that. I have never said different. Stranger

They edified the person with the gift of tongues. Stranger

You mean if you believed the Bible, we wouldn't be having this discussion. I agree. Stranger

Now you try and dismiss what the Scripture says by your lame one liners. This does not address what you or I were talking about. You are being deceptive in your answers. You cannot prove what you want by the Scripture. Now you turn to deception. That should tell you something. Stranger

You are trying to show that. But you are not able to show that by the Scripture. Again, what need would there be for a gift of interpretation of tongues if the one speaking in tongues knew what he was saying? Stranger

Yes, I agree. Stranger