Search results

Let me give you an example, John 5:4. Modern versions omit verse 4- But the story makes no sense without verse 4: Read verse 7: Jhn 5:2 - Now there is at Jerusalem by the sheep market a pool, which is called in the Hebrew tongue Bethesda, having five...

I agree it’s a great translation.

I’ve found the NET Bible full notes edition is a great study Bible. The notes are the most extensive I’ve ever seen.

The notes in the NET make it clear what was omitted and why but I don’t always agree with the decisions that were made and I don’t necessarily agree with your link. Just because something is older doesn’t make it better. Kind of ironic you want me to read a link you posted but you can’t read my...

The Alexandrian texts are not superior to the Byzantine. There’s nothing wrong with having a modern version but I like to know what was omitted and why. That’s why I like the NET full notes edition. Bottom line, the best Bible is the one that you read

It’s not a copy and paste

https://www.christianforums.com/threads/whats-missing-from-your-bible.8256997/

https://www.thenivbible.com/is-the-king-james-version-the-only-divinely-inspired-version/

Did you see the results of your poll?

What version do they prefer?

I doubt that stormyMonday believes in sola scriptura

I have to give it to you, you worked YEC in there with sinless perfection and King James Only. Not that I believe the earth is 4.5 billion years old but 6,000 years seems a little short.

Why did he pick the 1600s? Why didn’t we have a perfect Bible before then? Why weren’t the original manuscripts saved forever so there would be no confusion, no question?

A remedy was provided so it must have been an expectation. Weren’t there sin offerings in Old Testament times? It seems it has always been an expectation . Lev 4:3 - If the priest that is anointed do sin according to the sin of the people;then let him bring for his sin, which he hath sinned, a...

Good argument. But 1 John 2:1 says if we sin we have an advocate so it looks like stumbling was anticipated.

I don’t agree with everything on the site but some of it is valid. You can nitpick anything like he did the NKJV but some of the info on that site is worth looking into, some of it is nitpicking.

I used to be King James Only. It’s a fine translation but it’s not perfect. There’s nothing wrong with having a preference for it as long as you don’t let it become an idol. Having contempt for studying the original language makes no sense and you referred to the original language yourself when...

But the scholars that translated the KJV and the notes in it were divinely inspired. So the KJV is perfect, Christians can be perfect and let me guess the earth is 6,000 years old right?

Okay then we should take a look at the border, How do you rate Biden on his handling of refugees and illegal immigrants?

2Sa 15:6 -7 How could this be 40 years when David only ruled for 40 years? Check your perfect version. Here are some more not saying I agree with everything at this site Errors in the King James Version (Boy, are there a lot of them) – The Superior Word