Search results

What I can affect and what I see are 2 different things.

Repeating a lie does not make it true. What follows exposes every abuse of Scripture in a desperate attempt to back door what Scripture does not teach. Jesus was not sacrificed to the LORD by the people. Rather Jesus was God's sacrifice for us. Also, Jesus was not burned. Again, Jesus was not...

No. You cannot claim Jesus was, in effect, a container, emptying himself and then when scrutinized, change the subject to another container.

This is one of the most blatant appeals to mysticism trinitarians reach for. I agree, pouring out makes it Jesus, along with human nature to be a container. However, emptying the contents of a container does not change the nature of the container.

I see a lot more problems than just me in this fallen world. One of the biggest is the public debt - and the philosophies and flawed principles that led its creation. The US taxpayer has paid about $50T in interest on the debt. This only hurts the common man and only benefits the elite.

This is what I call a back door rationalization for what is not an explicit teaching in Scripture. Who loves human sacrifice? No one. Yet, throughout human history sacrifices have been made. Trump recently reminded us 38,000 military troops were sacrificed to build the Panama Canal. If you read...

I am not responding to Scripture but your abuse of it, pretending it teaches Jesus is define when it teaches he is a man. It's so funny you want to get away with an unsupported claim, that Jesus is define, what that is the debate! LOL

After the assassination attempt, the confidence changed to quiet, subdued. He knows he is Anointed by God to complete his mission. That is humbling.

Changing the subject, from sacrifice to something that is not true, Christ divinity.

Almost? Not enough grace in that trinitarian heart? LOL

And one other thing. The assassination attempt gave him Faith. A man who believes his life was literally saved by an all powerful Being for a purpose is a man on fire, burning to achieve his God given mission. No doubt the lawfare that threatened to imprison him for life took its toll on the...

Could be. But that is beyond what Scripture actually says. So, one speculation is as good as another. Certainly not definitive. I’m not sure why it does not bother Trinitarians that they have to read into Unitarian text, their doctrine all the time.

It’s simple. The trinity is an IDOL, manmade doctrine. It’s not like Scripture is silent on the nature of God so we are left to speculate where one conjecture is as good as another! Two Scriptural facts: Jesus did NOT teach us to pray to a trinitarian god. Jesus did teach us to pray to the...

Yes, God could have made the angels to then assist with creation. What are all these heavenly beings doing? Houtos means this. This (God’s word) was with God in the beginning. Not the pronoun ‘he’ referring to a non-existent person...

In Trinityland, God can have a God?! Right Mr Trinity (@face2face)? More proof text Jesus is NOT God. (No verse states God the Father has a God).

Yes, Jesus is our brother, which explains why he taught us to pray to God as he did, to our Father. Only siblings share a father. Also, it is telling that Jesus did not teach us to pray to a trinitarian god. Why would that be?

How could Jesus be the firstborn of all creation AND not be created, along with the rest of Creation?

Agency cannot be a thing to trinitarianism.

Angels are included in the meaning of Elohim. Who was God talking to when he said to make us? It could be the Angels.

there is no there there. Scripture says he is a man, which means by definition, he is not divine.