Search results

Do you understand figurative language? And while we’re at it, answer my 2nd question? We all know you claim to have answered it already. It’s just not true.

Figurative. In V2, this (word) was with God in the beginning. The word was made flesh, not God was made flesh. If your take is correct, why is it not in John’s literal purpose statement, 20:31?

Of course, Trinitarians want to confuse divinity, OF, with deity, IS.

No, you didn’t answer the 2nd question. The word was God but not Jesus.

Right! Not God was made flesh! And why do you gore my 2nd question?

God does not become as he is unchanging and has no flesh.

If you knew what Houtos means, you would not make this claim. THIS is with God at the beginning, not he (Jesus).

Yes, I am a Christian. Trinitarians falsely equate the 2. Yes, I follow a man named Jesus who is anointed by YHWH. YHWH gave this anointed man all authority in heaven and Earth. Read Deut. 28:15-18. Compare to John 1:45. Then read the whole chapter 1 from this point of view, this prophecy...

We’ve done numerous laps on this false claim by trinitarians. Two questions: Did you read the thread on Houtos means this (not he)? If the claim that Jesus is God incarnate is correct, why did John not put it in his purpose statement of 20:31?

No, he’s not and just ignore what I wrote about Moses.

Profound projection. John 1:45 is literal affirmation that Jesus is the man among the people of Israel chosen by God that Moses told them about that God would put his words in that man’s mouth.

Willful ignorance

LOL. Another trinitarian tried to do this projection. Biblical unitarians accept the teachings of Scripture, there is one God, the Father, Jesus is a man, God’s name is YHWH. Trinitarians reject the explicit teachings of the Bible and invent and reach at every turn. When it comes to reaching...

You don’t want to see.

That’s rich coming from a trinitarian, who reaches at every turn. When it comes to considering verse’s possible valid interpretations and implications outside the trinitarian box, FORGET ABOUT IT.

People are broken. This is true no matter who you look to. Some are more broken than others. Some has brokenness that is better hidden. We all wear social masks. How are you? Great.

An epistemology question. Good. How can humans know anything? Regarding person dependent answers, this is such a thing. It is called subjective opinion. Poll questions are an example. Coke or Pepsi? Subjective opinions depend on the subject of the sentence, you, your feelings, your...

You mean to say you lack the capacity to learn? Most people go from not knowing to knowing as they go through life. Not you? LOL

My friend, No need to flee the field of ideas. You put the container argument up for discussion. Let us discuss it. No need to rely on other's argument ability. Let's see together if it holds up to scrutiny. Isaiah 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together

Spending less than revenue received is a practical, soulful answer my friend. hmn