Search results

The Woke Bishop is an activist. In 2016 she is on record saying she has given up in talking to Trump. Honestly, I'm surprised Trump went to a church where she was speaking.

Accusations are not inherently false. Seems it is OK for you to accuse me of things. See post #3706, 3708, 3713, 3,716, 3718, 3720.

In 2016, Trump said when elected, he'll be God's gift for American jobs. In just a few days he's negotiated a staggering $1.1T in 2 deals, this and AI. I wish the Demonrats remain a permanent minority.

Nonsense. You don't have an argument of your own. So, your pretend my argument works against me. False witness. Still no answers to post #3,707.

Intellectually dishonest. I did not make a semantic statement. The concept of the trinity is not in the Bible and I'm sure you know that's what I mean when I say the trinity is not in the Bible. In fact, the trinity contradicts Scripture. This is why you and others often avoid questions. See...

Again, I reject your implied premise. Nowhere does Scripture say Jesus was God. Just another back door rationalization for dogma that contradicts Scripture. Regarding 2 John 1:7, the context is to oppose heresies developing during the time of the Apostles. In this case, claiming Jesus was a...

Yea, right. More projecting. The trinity is not in the Bible. This, you refuse to understand.

Yes and if the question were, "are Jews and Christians to be humanitarians," the answer based on Scripture, would be yes. But that's not the question, is it? The commandments you reference apply to us or restrict our behavior, not God. With almighty power to provide with so many poor unprovided...

God's name. Here is where JW, @Aunty Jane, have it right! God's name is not Jesus. He taught us to start praying by acknowledging God's name as holy, which is YHWH (or in English, Jehovah). Trinitarians cannot start by acknowledging Jesus' God because they worship another god, a false god, a...

You don't have a basic understanding of reading comprehension. The trinity is not in the Bible. Language Usage: No one sends themselves. If the Trinity were correct doctrine v3:2 and 3:17 would read God the Father sent God the Son. Facts go against the trinity. Whereas, the word was God in...

Nope. I just deny the eisegesis of trinitarianism. Did you read Deut 18:15-18? Where a man from the people of Israel would be chosen to have God's words put in his mouth? Did you read 1:21, about the expected prophet? Did you read 1:45 where Philip tells Nathanael they found the very person...

Right but God did not become flesh and this is because John never made the claim that Jesus was God incarnate. You are just ignoring all the verses that prove your dogma wrong. John is the most anti-trinitarian book of the Bible. In today's devotional reading at chapter 3, we find at verse 2...

Neither could Jesus. That's why the Bible repeatedly and explicitly says that God raised Jesus from the dead. The verses you quote only mean that Jesus voluntarily submitted to the Cross. This is also stated in different ways. It doesn't mean Jesus was God. What verse says this? This line of...

Because you don't want to see. The prophecy is of a man among the people of Israel, not God incarnate.

As a student of history, I must set the record straight. The Founding Father's added the religiously significant #12 Amendments to the Constitution, The famous 10 Bill of Rights and 2 others. 11th: Judicial Limits of Jurisdiction 12th: Choosing POTUS & VP. After the disastrous Revolution of...

No answer to my 2nd question or how 1:45 proves Jesus was the literal expected prophet Moses told us about in Deut 18:15-18? Sad IDOLATRY. Sad intellectual dishonesty.

Think. Words are not a different person from the person who speaks them. Also, the entire Bible (written by Jewish Unitarians, who reject the trinity to this day), Gospel of John, chapter 1 and especially Deut 18:15-18 and 1:45 have to be looked at in perspective.

I read this great article about this from zerohedge. The 14A always included 2 requirements. Born or naturalized. Subject to the Jurisdiction of the US. It was only in the last couple of decades that the Left has disregarded the 2nd requirement, which specifically excludes illegal aliens...

This reminds me of a vid the other day that said for years that THE DEMOCRATS MAJOR IN MINORS.

You got to be kidding me?! You claim his figurative prologue means God came incarnate - in contradiction of 1:45, Deut 18:15-18 - but is excluded from his literal purpose statement? Trinitarian logic on display.