Search results

Another post from the "uninformed."

What has never occurred to you is that 1 Corinthians 14 shows the difference between the SIGN of tongues, and the GIFT of diverse kinds of tongues. Both are called speaking in tongues, but one is appropriate for use in the congregation, and the other isn't, but only for prayer and praise...

Don't you see that the languages cannot be understood WITHOUT the supernatural gift of interpretation of tongues. Verse 2 tells us why? "NO MAN CAN UNDERSTAND THEM," besides the fact that they are not for preaching to man, but speaking to God. Your tone in the OP is a prime example of why in...

Sorry, but you don't know what you are talking about, and neither did MacArthur when he taught it. Your interpretation of Acts 2 flies directing in contradiction to 1 Corinthians 14:2. The devout Jews heard supernaturally what was being said, just as what happens with the gift of interpretation...

Tongues are true when the person has been born again of the Spirit of Christ. IOW been baptized in the Spirit. One key prerequisite is repentance from all sin. Tongues are false when the person has never repented of all sin, and thus has not received the Holy Spirit in the first place. For me I...

Of course, the Old Covenant only ended at His death, not during His life. The New Covenant is a will and testament that only comes into effect at the death of the testator.

Hey friend, Universal atonement can also mean the false doctrine of Universalism - God saves everybody in mankind no matter what you believe or do. There is no hell. But Dave is not talking about that doctrine. The "works" of this universal atonement calls our faith in Christ as a work. Also...

Tell them to email you the directions! ;)

What myth? Daniel 8 being Antiochus Epiphanes IV which is true, or Matthew 24 is just 70 AD which is false?

Lame? That wasn't nice, but considering the source, and your usual response to me... The point is regarding the OP. Daniel 8 IS in reference to Antiochus Ephiphanes IV and it was before Christ that Maccabees cleansed the temple. So the other abomination of desolation that Daniel 9 spoke of and...

I see there are three pages so don't know if anyone else brought this up but, the reason why Antiochus Epiphanes IV is brought up is because he was a foreshadow of the future Antichrist and future abomination of desolation that both Jesus and Daniel spoke of in Daniel 9. But what is missed is in...

I learned something on another site from one poster. What mainly happens with me is when I'm responding to a post, the Holy Spirit will suddenly enlighten me on something that I never knew before as I'm typing. That has happened over and over. Each time it happens, I pull up one of my word...

That is nice to know. You seem to be the first!

I understand what you guys mean, but what Paul was warning the Gentiles was to not be haughty regarding the Jews (the heresy of replacement theology), because if God cut off the natural branches, He could cut them off too if they didn't endure to the end and went back to living in sin, which...

I'll send you a comment privately - watch for mail.

I'm a little confused as to your timing. You don't mean at death do you? When we are born again of the Spirit of Christ, which must happen in order to be a Christian, our spirit will contain the seed of the Father. 1 John 3:9; Romans 8:9

LOL Did you not understand my post? Read it again. I am not 'for' the modern versions, but against them. And your reasoning is why, and we agree, so what's the problem. I am not 'for' sinning up a storm! I'm against sinning. And I am 'for' understanding the conditions of God, which in this...

Every translation I can find on biblegateway, calls it THEIR OWN OLIVE TREE. In other words, GOD'S PEOPLE. God's people started with the Jews, in unbelief some were cut off and Gentiles (wild) were grafted into God's people. And when the Jews come back they can easily be grafted back into God's...

Evidently you didn't read this part of the verse, so I'll repeat it. The natural olive tree IS the "good" olive tree. It is "natural." In unbelief they were cut off, but if they repent, they can be grafted back into the same tree. Not sure what obscure version you have, but the translator made...

I agree 50%. The wild olive tree are Gentiles. But Israel is the natural olive tree. Period. 23 And they also, if they do not continue in unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. 24 For if you were cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and were grafted...