Search results

I reluctantly agree. Normally, Scott is on the money in political matters. This is a dramatic departure from reality. From Petroleum refining in the United States - Wikipedia: Petroleum refining in the United States in 2024 had a capacity of 18.4 million barrels per day. Although the US was...

John 1:1 does not say Jesus. John 1:14 does not say God became incarnate. His purpose statement in 20:31 does not state what you claim. See Deut 18:15-18. It’s right there for your nose. Jesus is NOT God.

Doubtful since Biden is doing this through Executive Order.

Here's the chase. Nothing in John's Gospel supports the trinity or the man-is-god thesis, aka God did not become incarnate. Nothing. In fact, John is the most anti-trinitarian book of the Bible. Trinitarians are reading into his prologue what contradicts his purpose statement of 20:31. How can...

Good question. Point is, just because religious proselytizing includes government power does not make it NOT a religious act. Venn diagram.

Not an answer to my question.

What you quote is from the horrible KJV translation. Better translations don't use the word doctrine but law or teaching. Other than accept Jesus as your lord, love is the limit of proper doctrine. (Beyond that humans have to complicate the hell out of divinely simple doctrine.) Best to...

No. I’m saying there are no Scriptures that plainly state Jesus existed eternally or even existed beyond our Creators plan for him before his 1st century birth.

I don’t care who you are. That’s funny, right there! What’s absent from Scripture is this complexity. The complexity is used to divert attention from the basic facts of Scripture: The trinity is not in Scripture. The trinity contradicts Scripture, which explicitly and repeatedly states YHWH...

There are no flaws in the syllogism I presented. Your claim that a syllogism’s validity depends on definition is incorrect. Syntax: P or -P is definition independent. P1. Redfan is P. P2. Wrangler is -P. C. Wrangler is not Redfan. P1. God is P. P2. Jesus is -P. C. Jesus is not God.

LOL. It’s also a religious act.

Attributes of a person, even the Supreme Being, aren’t another person.

You reject the proof at your own peril. The claim that ANY syllogism depends on definitions (beyone mutual exclusivity) is invalid. On top of that, you have utterly failed to demonstrate a definition of "brother" that means "father". Pathetic change in reference to pretend the problem you...

Yet, Jesus is NOT his own God. YHWH is his own God.

Imagine women on a Bachelor show competing and when they lose, expected to strip in front of nation? Bachelorette refuses to take responsibility for degrading men.

I’m not sure how many times I need to answer the question for you to be satisfied. Jesus is shown in Scripture praying more than once.

No, just trinitarians. They took 1 John 5:7 and tried to make it say something God’s words did not say. This explains s why more recent translations render it differently, meaning correctly, meaning in a way that does not support the trinity.

What verse says this?

Here is post 1427. It’s not even from you or any kind f of answer to my question.

Oy vey! You are changing the reference of these relational words. My cousin is a father but not my father. Although we have different jobs, we are both fans of football.