Search results

Paul's focus is on believers to show them that it won't just be unbelievers that bow down before Christ on His judgment seat. Unlike you, I am not ignoring what Paul wrote in Romans 14:11 where he references Isaiah 45:22-24 which refers to unbelievers also bowing before Christ. Do you deny that...

Matthew 25:31-46 makes it very clear that believers will also be there. Not every passage about the judgment contains all of the details about it. Cherry picking scripture the way you do is a poor approach to interpreting scripture.

This has nothing to do with OSAS. Why do you try to make everything about that? Matthew 25:31-46 very clearly portrays all people, saved and lost, being gathered at the same time before the judgment throne/seat of Christ to give an account of themselves after Jesus comes with His angels. Why do...

I obviously agree and can't comprehend how anyone could disagree. A judgment seat and judgment throne (as Matthew 25:31 mentions) are clearly the same thing. Obviously, you can't think that or else you'd be an amill. Yet, how is it possible that Matthew 25:41 is referring to something different...

Yes, I do. It will burn up the earth, as Peter said. He said nothing about the lake of fire in that verse. The judgment will occur after Jesus burns up the earth and that is when those whose names are not in the book of life will be cast into the lake of fire. More of your churchianity...

I sometimes wonder what Bible you are reading. You apparently think the fire mentioned in Revelation 20:9 (and 2 Peter 3:10-12) is the lake of fire? It is not. That occurs before the judgment which is when unbelievers will be cast into the lake of fire. Revelation 20:9 is not the same event as...

Look in the mirror. You try to claim that the prince of the people who destroyed the city and the sanctuary in 70 AD will be some future Antichrist. How can a future Antichrist be the prince of people who died a long time ago? You have no room to criticize someone else's interpretation when your...

Using emojis is not against the rules. If you don't want me to laugh at your posts, then stop talking about all that churchianity nonsense and stop saying ridiculous things such as that Luke 17:28-30 has something to do with destroying those in the graves when it instead clearly has the context...

You really need to ask God for wisdom (James 1:5-7) because you just butcher scripture sometimes. That passage is only talking about physical destruction, not destruction of "those left in the graves". Your own human wisdom (wisdom of man) is leading you astray. Yes, he absolutely did. He did...

There's a couple problems with seeing Christ's death on the cross as the abomination of desolation that Jesus spoke about in the Olivet Discourse. First, Jerusalem was not surrounded by armies when Jesus died on the cross. Second, no one fled to the mountains when Jesus died on the cross. So, I...

It's very simple from my perspective as an Amillennial believer, also. Yet, we disagree on this. Obviously, Amillennialism, in and of itself, doesn't dictate how one views this particular topic. According to Jesus Himself, all must appear before Him when He comes with His angels. That has not...

It doesn't imply that. It does not have to refer to an immediate action as of the time He said it. I thought you indicated that you understood that? Apparently not. He was talking about something that He was going to do in the future. He was going to come quickly. That's all He was saying. And...

Isaiah 45:22-24, which Paul references in Romans 14:11 in relation to the judgment seat of Christ, says otherwise. All people, including believers, will bow before Christ on His judgment seat and confess that He is Lord. Do you deny that unbelievers will ever bow before Him and confess that He...

I'm in shock. You actually got something right. Yes, Spiritual Israel does include Gentile believers as well. How can you understand this, but be wrong about pretty much everything else? I just don't get it. Keep studying. Maybe you'll come to understand the truth about the other things you're...

LOL! You think trying to argue that the prince of the people who destroyed the city and the sanctuary in 70 AD is some future Antichrist is convincing? In what way would a future Antichrist be the prince of people who died long ago? LOL! If only you knew how ridiculous your arguments are. But...

Yes, I do, but you clearly don't. No, I am not saying that. I have done that. Any other lies about me that you want to tell? I have not yet appeared before Jesus to give an account of myself and neither have you. Very simple. Don't foolishly put words in my mouth. You will be very surprised...

You are the ignorant one here. No one has yet bowed before the judgment seat of Christ to give an account of themselves. You are ignorantly turning something simple into something complicated because of your tendency to spiritualize everything you read. Jesus Himself made it clear that it will...

Paul indicates that being part of spiritual Israel is NOT dependent on being a physical descendant of national Israel, yet you say otherwise. Romans 9:6 6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. 7 Nor because they are his descendants are...

Several times I have pointed out to these people who deny that Luke 21:20-24a, Matthew 24:14-22 and Mark 13:14-20 are parallel accounts of the same event that Luke worded things a little differently (such as saying "when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies" instead of "when you see the...

Doesn't matter. In this case, it clearly does not mean that. There is no sense in which Jesus, at the time He spoke those words, was continually coming quickly. That clearly makes no sense whatsoever. That contradicts the meaning of the word quickly. You can't come quickly over a continuous...