Search results

Yet another verse disproving the trinity. Rev 7:10 indicates salvation is not a function of 3 Beings but 2, YHWH in conjunction with his lamb. It’s telling that you invoke an extreme eisegesis translation that amplifies its trinitarian doctrine into unitarian text.

It’s a covenant. Your responsibility is not dependent on anything.

It’s not her choice, it is his. And as a Godly wife, you need to respect it.

What superiority game? Some ideas are simply wrong. None more obvious than the trinity. I don’t recall you addressing the ABC’s and 123’s. Why is that? Yup.

Yup. Did you read the asterisk note? “Something like” means not just the word but the concept.

The word “can” is dubious, not to be confused with reliable. Perhaps if I was actually being attacked by a burglar, the cat would assist. I much, much prefer the dogs to alert me to the burglars presence while they are outside the house perimeter. Not for nothing do I have the sticker...

I’m glad you asked that question. God was God before Jesus came into existence at his birth. BC There were 2 groups: Gentiles and Jews under the Covenant that God directly established with the Patriarchs. God established a New Covenant that united these 2 groups. How? In Christ. Through...

Appeal to Strawman. I did not say the word trinity.

You keep asserting your doctrine in circular fashion. You asked me about the glory Jesus had before and I answered it. You have to live with the answer now. FYI. None of my answers will EVER support the trinity in any way because the trinity is inherently contradictory.

Now, you are contradicting yourself. Jesus is a human being. Therefore, Jeremiah 1:5 applies to Jesus.

I did NONE of the things you accuse me of! You invoke circular reasoning. What makes you think God is restricted in who he can give ALL authority to? It is circular to suppose God gave authority to himself! Not ‘the Father’ as the trinitarians prefer but God, in his Unitarian nature, gave all...

The patriarchy is not due to power but merit. There should be gratitude from feminists for men who created and maintain civilization.

The profoundly anti-feminist philsopher properly identifies it as Cultural Marxist in origin. It short, she says if you want to be equal, go be equal, don't petition government to pretend there is equality when there isn't.

How come not one verse has the trinity* in it? * verse that reads something like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever.

A son as opposed to THE son? So, you admit there was a time before that day that Jesus was not the Son of God?

As I said, I already answered it twice.

You keep repeating this lie, which I have exploded many times in this thread. Where are the feminists demanding equality in these 6 areas from Post #373?

So twisted that you take an act of love and turn it into hate. God choose to guve women much greater burden of child rearing. Take it up with him.

Speculative question that is contrary to God's word and Jesus' confession that he knew less than God,

Wrong I've already answered this question twice. Eisegesis. Not one verse says this. You don't want to admit there was a day before "today" the day he became God's son, which was written after he was resurrected.