Search results

To answer one of your points, there're varying views on who is Black Hebrew Israelite. Some BHI sects say other races are Israelites, others, condemn the belief.

Sure, but New Eve she is NOT. Good for you that you're capable of honesty unlike some Church "authorities" who are in denial.

Thanks!

I believe in salvation by faith and works so let's not go there.

When were you "quite clear"? Please share a link. Why am I interested in truth? Man I never thought of that, I should just enjoy being lied to! Problem solved! End of thread! God's Word shouldn't be taken seriously! What was I thinking!?

So, again, you're being honest and agreeing the Church is New Eve correct? You're just trying to find a way that Mary still fits?

So, again, you're being honest and agreeing the Church is New Eve correct? You're just trying to find a way that Mary still fits?

God crushes the head of the serpent Romans 16:20. You're not supposed to worship Mary as a god.

I guess every woman in the Church is New Eve then? That means Mary isn't special.

By the way, this is an admission that you see the Scripture based logic in the Church as New Eve correct? How many times is that taught by your Church?

Mary is not the New Eve, the Church is. Show me any of three empty traditions you espouse here in Scripture. Perhaps by that same logic, Christ isn't the only "New Adam" since the Pope's are all supposedly in His stead--maybe there're many dozens of "New Adam"s. You'd believe any baselesss...

Complaint already answered. Also not relevant, really, to the dismantling of your Church's error going on here.

I'm not getting lost in the weeds. You have no answer.

Complaint already responded to. Waiting for end user to reply intelligibly.

Everything in Scripture testifies on behalf of what I've put forth (the Church as New Eve). What is your response? Disdain. You disdain God and His Word because they run afoul of your tradition. Last I checked Christ didn't smile on such things.

Well, I'm afraid we'll just have to go back to the topic then.

I used English words didn't I? I'll keep waiting for your response.

Already did. You call it one thing, I call it another thing.

Already did.

Look at this mess : you actually describe reliance on an "odd" Scriptural dynamic as "dancing around" and "making accommodations", then, just because the dynamic relied upon is "odd" you want me to find your "odd" (ie, incorrect, unScriptural) speculations and pontifications about your error on...