Search results

For your enrichment, a treatment of the passage.

1. I noticed you didn't explain which part I "twisted", you just made an empty assertion. Go ahead and substantiate your empty claim. I'll be waiting. 2. Yes, we are "saved" by the blood of the Lamb. Who else was "saved" by the blood of the Lamb? The Jews. Our salvation was typed by their...

Yes, we do have eternal life--"and the life is in His Son--He who has the Son has the life" 1 John 5:11-12--but, again, those who fall away from the faith no longer have the Son 2 Corinthians 13:5 (and the Biblical and historical example for this actually occurring with believers is provided in...

You disagree with the Greek. Thanks for admitting you reject Scripture.

"An" "incomplete question"? 1. I responded many times, not just once. 2. I wasn't asking questions, I was responding to you with answers. You have no answers to my answers.

OH MY GOSH THE "LIKE" OF THE BEAST! LOL! Indeed, Jesus saves!

I stand by every refutation of your ignorance I've made. I'm not saying you Calvinists can't know God--on the contrary, many of you have great trust in God--but you're ignorant anyway. LOL

2/2 Protestantism [Calvinism]'s Big Justification Lie Notes Well, bad news, guys : Scripture actually teaches regeneration and justification are one and the same. Good news for my view is that these very same men (who clearly are at odds with Scripture) unwittingly teach (while reading the...

1/2 Protestantism [Calvinism]'s Big Justification Lie Notes Here, for the assistance of the readers (including yourself), are some notes that can disabuse people of your false justification doctrine: According to "Reformed" theology, regeneration and justification are two separate acts which...

1) Oops! Paul could not speak to the Corinthian Christians as spiritual men but only as carnal men, so he could only impart the milk, the basics, of the Gospel--the "spiritual wisdom" the carnal men consider "folly" refers only to things the "spiritually mature" could hear, not to the Gospel...

No, actually, the Greek shows that the "this is a gift" refers to the "salvation" not the "faith"--and, even in English, "not of works" would be redundant if "faith" was what "this is a gift" referred to. OBVIOUSLY "faith" and "works" are in completely different categories, so why would it be...

Yeah you have no answers. I'm glad you're showing that to everyone. Your theology is baseless.

Refer to my previous reply where I've already answered these things.

So according to you if a Chinese speaking person preaches the Gospel to an English speaking person they can have faith? LOL Why does Paul say he would prefer to speak a few words in an intelligible language rather than 10000 words in an unknown language then? Because no one is spritually edified...

Anyway, there are no unbelievers with faith--that's an oxymoron.

Oops! The verse you're referencing teaches those born of God, who retain God's Word in themselves, don't CONTINUE in sin (see the exegesis of the Greek of that verse here) I agree. That stipulation doesn't cover those who do not keep the seed. Being God's child isn't immutable Deuteronomy 32:5...

Regarding Hebrews 3, it says by means of sin hearts are hardened and that it can happen to "brothers". Update : I reread what you said and boy are you mixed up. LOL You have to do all kinds of mental gymnastics to retain your position. Where is an unbeliever said to have faith? That would make...

I wonder about dividing water and Spirit that way--"whoever believes, from his inner being will flow rivers of living water (this he spake of the Spirit)" John 7:38-39 right? So isn't the Spirit the water? I wonder. Seems so.

Again, though, they're married to God (believers).

Well, he calls them "adulterers and adulteresses" so he affirms they're married to God (believers). It is unhelpful to give leeway to OSASers by interpreting James 2 as anything but a call to repentance IMO.