Search results

Choosing carefully who one confides in is wise. Facebook on the other hand is putting ones head in the lions mouth.

The Spirit and the Father witness to Jesus for our sake

We are humans.....we are his witnesses......we witness to the character of God to those around us ie, if we have known him. If we are not witnessing to the character of God we witness to something else, it's usually how right we are.....and we love the glory of predicting the future as if the...

God is a consuming fire the scripture says. Love is synonymous with God 1 John tells us. It is as a consuming fire for all who love corruption. It trumps anything which is not compatible with it. When Jesus returns, the world will cry for the rocks and the mountains to fall on them. Why? Because...

'Two or three witnesses.' The language comes from the Hebrew. It was required to verify a matter. Throughout history there have always been at least two witnesses to validate and verify that which is pertinent and there will continue to be. The Spirit and the Father at Jesus baptism, Moses and...

'The word of God?'....would you like to qualify it? Is it the bible, is it your version of understanding, is it some other thing or is it Jesus?

What Makes Ex-Christians Think They Once Were Christians? Does a label make anybody anything?

Equating the word 'biblical' with the right doctrine or inerrant thing to believe is in a sense an oxymoron. For example, slavery was justified from the bible in the southern states of the US ....yes, 'slavery' is biblical. The subjugation of women is justified by many from the bible......by...

Is that what Cyrus did? or what about the Donkey who spoke to Balaam? Attempting to twist God's arm by employing our logic/ rationale only speaks of our shortsightedness.

a) would you prefer I didn't respond? b) no, I'm not claiming that. I am saying he holds the title of accuser, not Jesus.

Be assured Behold, it makes sense, it's just that you don't understand......think, think, think......laterally!

of course you do T77...because it undermines your eisegesis which you consider exegesis......which in your eyes validates your narrative. There's a name for that but there's no point talking about it because you would in all probability deny it. :)

verse 3, is a likening process. This process is expanded to the reality in the later part of the verse. keep it in context.

This is not exegesis but eisegesis These texts speak of consequence, not suggestions of a future temple.

The Gospel is also known as the everlasting Gospel. It includes 'the Lamb slain before the foundation of the World' If this is the case, how can The Gospel be about man's response aka 'believing in him'? if it is everlasting, ie always been.....meaning, it was around before the creation of the...

how so?

It is a judgement scene. Any judgement scene is instigated by an accuser. It is the accuser who keeps the records. Judgement is never initiated by the judge. And the 'other' book? What book might that be? The book of Life?.....and who has that?...the accuser? or another? further.....those whose...

I'm not?.....do you mean your protracted song in various threads, is not a song? Jesus said to his disciples 'are you still so dull' Matt 15:16 ....why did he resort to this? ......because he was frustrated with spoon feeding them at every turn. Think, think, think!

Reading the landscape accurately is useful and helpful. My comment in post #33 was sarcastic!......do you wonder why I resorted to this?

lol, ok no book! .....how about a song? :)