Search results

When you disagree with me, that only confirms even more that what I believe is true. You are wrong about everything. Uh huh. And Luke 21:20-24 is a parallel passage to Matthew 24:15-21. What is described there matches what happened in 70 AD in Jerusalem. Yes, and, just as Jesus prophesied...

How do you know how he applies that? I'm trying to get him to tell me how he interprets it and all he does is comment on verses 1 to 12. He knows he has no way of reconciling verses 16 to 21 with Amil, especially if he takes it literally like he does the rest of the chapter, but he just ignores...

Animal sacrifices and sin offerings were required during the feast of tabernacles. Why would that be required in the future when Jesus made animal sacrifices and offerings obsolete long ago when He established the new covenant with His blood?

Your words are meaningless without scriptural support. Show me the scripture which describes the day of the Lord as you understand it. Show me where scripture indicates that it "has several segments to it" and that it "extends into eternity".

If you're talking about what Jesus called "great tribulation" and "great distress in the land" in the Olivet Discourse, then what started it was the Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem and then attacking the people in the city while destroying the city itself including its temple buildings around...

Weak response. Zechariah 14:16 And it shall come to pass that everyone who is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, and to keep the Feast of Tabernacles. 17 And it shall be that whichever of the families of...

Congratulations on agreeing with Premils in how to interpret Zechariah 14. Way to go, buddy.

What is the reason you are ignoring my request to show how you reconcile Zechariah 14:16-21 with Amil? Does your Bible stop at verse 12 in Zechariah 14?

I asked you about verses 16-21. How do you make those verses fit with Amil? Zechariah 14:16-21 is about the same time period as the verses you quoted here.

That wasn't my point. My point is that your chart doesn't accurately show that the day of the Lord is a 24 hour day during which, at some point, Jesus will come unexpectedly as a thief in the night and will bring "sudden destruction" upon unbelievers from which "they shall not escape". You...

Nonsense. Jesus did not indicate that anyone would know before that day of His second coming actually comes. Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away. 36 “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only. 37...

LOL. You call that backing it up? One passage in the OT proves your claim? Give me a break. You have already shown that you are not able to prove that Zechariah 14 is about the second coming of Christ. You are utterly unable to show how you can reconcile Zechariah 14:16-21 with that claim. Is...

Obviously. I didn't say otherwise. The obvious one is Daniel 9:26-27, but I believe Deuteronomy 28:15-68 and Leviticus 26:32-33 pertain to 70 AD, also. But, why does it matter which prophecies in the OT I think relate to 70 AD? What difference does that make? Why are you trying to argue with me...

LOL. I don't see anyone else having trouble understanding my points. Don't blame me for your lack of reading comprehension skills, Douggg. The fact that you rely so much on charts is basically an admission that you have a reading comprehension problem and you need to see charts in order to...

Your chart is wrong. Paul and Peter both made it abundantly clear that on the day of the Lord mass destruction will occur from which unbelievers will not escape. Your understanding of the day of the Lord blatantly contradicts what is written in 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-12.

Nonsense. You are twisting scripture to fit your view and you do that constantly. You are not understanding that 1 Thessalonians 4:13-5:11 is all about one event that will happen on a day and in an hour that no one knows, which is the second coming of Christ. Paul indicates that we are not...

Where does Paul say that? Nowhere. In context, what he said in 1 Thessalonians 5 was that Christians are not appointed to the wrath that will come in the form of "sudden destruction" from which unbelievers "shall not escape" on the day of the Lord's second coming as a thief in the night. LOL. I...

Yes, I say that to everyone who doesn't address my arguments. I'm consistent like that. You did not address it. You response said NOTHING about the context of 1 Thessalonians 5. I showed the context of 1 Thessalonians 5:9-11 by looking at the previous verses. You said NOTHING in response to...

Yeah, I know what you think, Douggg. And you are wrong. We should be comforted to know that we will not have to experience the "sudden destruction" from which unbelievers "shall not escape" on that day, as Paul indicated in 1 Thessalonians 5:2-11. I agree that the context of 1 Thessalonians...

Do you ever look at scripture in context? The context of Luke 21:20-24 is in relation to all things being fulfilled that were written in relation to the destruction of Jerusalem, not literally all things. Hello? It's a historical fact that Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, so all things written...