Search results

Being an interpretation and commentary on scripture, that fails the acid test as far as authority is concerned. As much as I love you brother, I defer to the authority of God. Then you haven't read the NT. Such an observation as above is astounding.

And that death was laid on Jesus. Now what? The police officer has let you off even though you were doing 125mph through the city. What you gonna to do? A burn out as you do an illegal U-turn leaving him enveloped in a cloud of smoke?

Ain't that a worry when airlines demand their pilots must be vaccinated.

I think we ought to note perhaps that the law itself isn't death... It's the ministration of the law which is death.

Exactly. So there was nothing wrong, or faulty, with the covenant itself, but with the people God made the covenant with. They promised what they couldn't deliver. Now today, getting your head around that idea is problematic with some. They think great, the old covenant was faulty, the new...

Herein lies the perfect example of selective reading. Curtis blamed the covenant itself for 3000 deaths. You agree, claiming the Bible as your proof, but what does the bible actually say? Where did God place the fault and blame? Now. Read it again.

Not sure if this has been put up before, but it's worth a watch. Coming to a town everywhere.

Wow. God established a covenant in order to kill 3000 people. And because it didn't work properly, ie faulty, He had a new one made up that worked just great.

Depends. What do you mean by the expression, "under the law?"

It seems you are making this up as you go. You bring one objection, is answered, you respond by ignoring the answer and go off on a tangent somewhere else. Abraham was a friend of God. Just like us. God accounted Abraham as righteous. Just like us. And KJV Genesis 26:5 5 because that Abraham...

Those that died didn't die because of the law. Death is the wages of sin. Sin is transgression of the law. Jesus died because of the sin that was placed on Him, He rose because He didn't sin personally. It ain't the law's fault you die. It's yours.

Darn. But I'm sure you know what to do. God bless... Keep out of the trees.

None of which applies to the weekly Sabbath.

The slightest step toward Catholicism is a giant leap toward apostasy.

Again, your opinion, without any biblical support.

Straw man. And false assumptions. You have been castigating Barney for making all Commandments equal, now you are castigating me for an assumption on your part, that of making Sabbath keeping of more importance than loving God? Why would anyone ever want to observe the Sabbath, if they didn't...

And there's the problem and core issue at hand. It is, quote, I'm saying literal sabbath keeping is not required. It isn't the scriptures saying that, if it were, anti Sabbath folk would have been quoting the text for centuries and the issue would have always been on the same level as...

Would continuing neglect of the Sabbath, despite all evidence to the Sabbath's authenticity and pertinence, constitute slavery to sin?

I'm not talking about sacrifice of worship... Your phrase. I'm talking about simple authority. Either God has the authority to command or He doesn't. It's either a suggestion, or a command. Of course you don't 'have to' obey. It's your choice. Just as it's your choice whether you murder or not...

I'm sorry, but I really don't understand. God gives a Commandment, but you need to be convinced His command is 'moral' before you obey it?