Search results

Why is it that you can see parallels between Revelation 19 and 21 and between Revelation 19 and 22 despite them not having all the same details, but you can't see any parallels between Revelation 19 and 20? Is there any reason that Satan can't be cast into the LOF right after the beast and false...

How about you stick to what Amils believe now? Are you debating us Amils who post on this forum or trying to debate Amils who died long ago? None of the Amils here believe in any of this 7th and 8th day nonsense that you're talking about. All of your posts in this thread are complete, utter...

None of this that you're saying here is taught in the Bible anywhere as it relates to the thousand years and to the Amil vs. Premil debate. Did you decide that using the Bible to support biblical doctrine is something you're no longer interested in?

I can only assume you have given up trying to support Premil and refute Amil using scripture, so you have resorted to this nonsense instead. Why not just admit that Amil is true instead of wasting your time talking all this embarrassing nonsense in a desperate attempt to support your doctrine...

I'd like to make an argument that's as strong as the argument you made in this post. 1 + 1 = 2 2 + 2 = 4 4 + 4 = 8 Clearly, this proves that Premil is completely absurd and makes no logical sense. Good luck trying to refute this argument.

Since I was the last one to reply to you, I assume this was meant for me? What evidence do you have to suggest that God's angels would ever be portrayed as being in the bottomless pit (abyss)? We can see descriptions of Satan being cast to the bottomless pit and the beast being in the bottomless...

If you have any idea of what his point is in this thread in relation to Amil vs. Premil, please fill me in. Because I can't make any sense out of anything he's saying in this thread as it relates to Amil vs. Premil. As far as I can tell, he's just looking to debate the age of the earth instead...

This has absolutely nothing to do with the Amil vs. Premil debate. What are you talking about here? Are you talking about day 7 of this week? You couldn't be more vague if you tried. Explain what you're talking about and what exactly it has to do with the Amil vs. Premil debate. What 8th day...

What do you mean by this exactly? You're being very vague here. Again, what do you mean exactly by "this"? Explain what you're talking about here. And, what has happened to you? Or have you always been this judgmental and I just didn't realize it? You can say a lot of things about me. I have...

Are you saying you believe Apollyon/Abaddon is Jesus? Yep, that's what you were saying, alright. Wow. You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. The bottomless pit has a negative connotation. You don't seem to be taking that into consideration here. The bottomless pit/abyss is where the beast and...

The claim, beginning with post #1, is that people like you and TS share a particular belief in common with Christadelphians. In his case, he shares their belief that there is no such thing as an evil spirit being named Satan or evil spirit beings called demons (you disagree with him about that)...

This is possibly the most ridiculous post I've ever seen. It's unbelievably ironic for you to claim that Amil makes no logical sense, when nothing in your entire post makes any logical sense, at least in relation to the Amil vs. Premil debate. You have obviously run out of ways to try to...

Come on, rwb. Who do you think you're talking to here? The onus is on BOTH OF US to back up what we claim, not just on me. You are alleging that evil spirits like Satan were created to be evil rather than having been created very good like everything else that was created and then turning...

Something else besides what? That Revelation 19:7 and Revelation 21:2,9-10 refer to the same event? You're not making any sense here. Revelation 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. 2 And I John saw...

No, ChatGPT is not able to reason at all. It's not a human being. It simply repeats things that it finds on the Internet that human beings have stated, which may or may not be correct.

I agree with this, but I think "the armies which were in heaven" include His angels as well. But, there's no reason to think that verse 14 does not at least include the same ones who were said to be "arrayed in fine linen" in verse 7, which refers to the Lamb's wife. Of course not. I know...

Are you saying you agree with all of this, including where it says "therefore, those saints must have already been resurrected/glorified" in relation to the wife of the Lamb in Revelation 19:7? You don't see Revelation 19:7 as referring to a scene in heaven just before Christ returns? From the...

Try to refrain from referencing Amils generically like this. Say "some Amils" instead of just saying "Amils" since not all Amils have the same understanding of these verses. In my view, there is obviously only one bride of Christ, so Revelation 19:7 and Revelation 21:2,9-10 have to be referring...

No, I agree that those are referring to the same event relating to the same wife/bride of the Lamb/Christ, which is the church. At least, in relation to the bride/wife of the Lamb coming with Him from heaven. But, the marriage supper (mentioned in Rev 19:7) does not take place while the bride is...

Where did anyone ever claim that you are a Christadelphian? Saying that you believe a certain thing similar to what Christadelphians believe doesn't make you a Christadelphian. You understand that, right?