Search results

I receive the love of the truth, so you're wrong yet again. It's amazing how people like you never tire of being wrong. There's no reason to break it because it's so obvious. You apparently just have a desire to be different or something, so this is what you have come up with. Total nonsense...

Yes, he is. He has made that clear in several posts in the past. He denies the existence of non-physical spirit beings called angels or demons. So, I was concerned that you were agreeing with him about that. I don't know what you mean by this. Can you explain? It comes across like you are...

Do you deny the existence of an evil, supernatural spirit being named Satan like he does? Do you deny that angels and evil spirits/demons exist like he does?

LOL. You spew so much nonsense. Who said that Satan himself inhabits billions of unsaved people? Not me or anyone. He is obviously not the only evil spirit out there. The Bible talks about Satan and his angels. Satan is the king of the fallen angels, but he is only one of them. You are the one...

@rwb I see that you liked this post. You actually agree with this nonsense? If so, then that's honestly disappointing.

I did not say otherwise. Take your time for once and read what I actually said. Read my post again and read what I was responding to that you said. You said this: So, I am disagreeing with you about this and telling you that the strong man is Satan and that his house is Satan's kingdom and his...

Does context mean nothing to you? Those scriptures do not say that literally all OT scriptures were fulfilled or would be fulfilled as of 70 AD. Luke 21:22 relates specifically to the OT scriptures that were related to the events of 70 AD, not literally all OT scriptures. Good grief. Please ask...

I don't know what you're asking here. Can you try again? If you didn't, then you at least never addressed your understanding of that from what I can recall. What rewards do you think were doled out in 70 AD? What is your point? You are suggesting that the biblical authors relied on ANE...

It seems that you have read a good number of WPM's posts and of my posts as well. How are you still not familiar with how we understand the thousand years? Do you not know what Amillennialists like us believe? If not, why do you try to debate us? It makes no sense to debate against something you...

It's so unfortunate that you ruin your Amil witness with your nonsense about denying the existence of evil spiritual beings like Satan and his demons, like the one that possessed the man in relation to the passage we're talking about here (Matthew 12:28-29). Despite your false denial, yes, the...

Don't forget to pray for yourself and ask God for wisdom (James 1:5-7)

No, I added that tidbit that they could have also looked at that, but my primary argument is that they should have accepted what is written in Isaiah 40:22. Why did you leave that part out while acting as if I only referenced the moon? Because you are dishonest, that's why. You are going out of...

Enough of your nonsense already. You blatantly twist the text by making a prophecy about Christ into a prophecy about an imaginary Antichrist instead and you twist the text by making a covenant into a treaty. It's a complete joke. Here is the truth about the 70 weeks, which can be discerned by...

No, the strong man represents Satan and I will demonstrate that. Yes, Jesus was casting demons out of people at that time, but the context of the verses is in relation to Satan's kingdom and His authority over Satan and his kingdom, including his angels/demons. I'll quote the whole relevant...

Do you just ignore the part of that verse that says God "put all things in subjection under His feet" and "left nothing that is not put under Him" long ago? How do you reconcile your understanding of the only part of the verse that you underlined and highlighted in large text with the rest of...

It is described as "a great chain", which implies that it does not restrict Satan's activities entirely (a small chain would be far more restrictive), and the scene is symbolically represented as a dragon being chained up in a prison. Satan is not a physical being who can be literally chained up...

Do you not think that the strong man represents Satan and that Jesus is the one who bound the strong man and spoiled his goods and his house? If not, who do you think the strong man represents and what do you think his house represents and what do you think his goods represents?

Yeah, so? How does this relate at all to what I'm saying about those who believed in a flat earth? Is it too much to ask for you to be specific about whatever point you're trying to make here? All I see is a false equivalence here, but I can only guess as to what exactly you are intending to...

Is being specific just something you're not interested in? What are you talking about exactly?

What evidence do you have to show he didn't say that? None. Is it too hard for you to ask him where he found that quote instead of just assuming he made it up and again making yourself look bad? Here is Clement's entire quote including the source, which was Clement of Alexandria, Stromata, book...