Search results

I can't help that you decided to apply something I specifically said about certain people who died long ago to yourself. Just stop doing that. I don't know what you're talking about here. I could not possibly care less what you think of me. But, the fact of the matter is that I said nothing...

His post was obviously not just a one liner, so what in the world are you talking about? One liners are your specialty.

Please just quit while you are (way) behind. That WAS a direct quote by Clement. He quoted Daniel 9:24. And covenantee quoted what Clement said which included the quote of Daniel 9:24. Hello? Do you enjoy making yourself look bad over and over again? What is wrong with you?

Yes, so I was talking about them and, presumably, not you, right? You responded with an insult directed towards me. How do you figure that is equivalent? I guess you'd be okay with me saying that those who see things as I do relating to this see you as stupid because of your preterist view of...

Right. Dispies read it as if it says 69 weeks are determined, but the 70th week is undetermined. It's just an absolutely blatant twisting of the text. Their intellectual dishonesty with the text makes me nauseous. Terrible.

This guy never ceases to make a fool of himself. He is not well.

I didn't say anything about anyone seeing you as stupid, so why did you go there? I was talking about those who believed the earth is flat. Do you believe that? If not, then why make this personal towards me when I didn't make it personal towards you?

Agree. Which is why I know not to heed your advice on anything to do with Eschatology.

Yeah. What is your point? Because they were stupid and, apparently, never read Isaiah 40:22. And, did they never look at the moon? Why would they think the earth would be shaped completely differently than the moon? No doubt? Only if they were stupid. LOL. Give me a break. LOL. Thanks for...

There's no worse interpretation of scripture than the dispensationalist interpretation of Daniel 9:27 that you have. Applying a verse that refers to Christ confirming the new covenant while making the old covenant sacrifices and offerings obsolete to an imaginary Antichrist instead is just...

Agree 100%. The text itself DEMANDS that the 70 weeks all be consecutive with no gaps. Otherwise, it can't be said that 70 weeks (490 years) were determined, but instead that at least 2,500 or so years were determined to fulfill the prophecy.

This claim is every bit as ridiculous as the claim that there are two sets of 70 weeks. How can you not recognize that the six things in Daniel 9:24 that were given a 70 week time period to be fulfilled are not already fulfilled? When else was reconciliation for iniquity made except by Christ on...

Those are talking about OT scriptures that specifically refer to the Messiah (Jesus, obviously), not all OT scriptures. Why do you act as if those are talking about literally all OT scriptures when Jesus Himself referred to "everything written about me"? He didn't say "everything written"...

How about actually answering my question? Tell me how the thousand years was fulfilled in the first century. I'm fine with not seeing it as a literal thousand years, but how do you figure that it could represent a small amount of time? Tell me how the dead in Christ were all already resurrected...

I said to stop being vague. This is just another vague response from you. Are you afraid to be clear and specific or what? Okay, here we go. You are revealing yourself to be a fake who doesn't trust in what the Bible teaches and trusts secular science over the Bible. Thank you for revealing...

Says the guy who posts nothing of substance in any of his posts. You quote some scriptures, but do not exegete them and do nothing to show their context, which is useless.

LOL. I can't believe you expect to be taken seriously with this nonsense. Resorting to AI to back up your claims? LOL. Unbelievable. LOL. So, tell me how the thousand years all happened in the 1st century generation? Tell me how all of the dead are already resurrected. Tell me how Jesus has...

It's the truth, dramatic or not. LOL. Sure, you do. If the peers have no reverence for the word of God, why do you trust them? You have proven time and time again that you do not understand "proper hermeneutics, such as grammar, syntax, context, historical setting, audience relevance" nearly...

What are you talking about? Are you incapable of speaking clearly? Stop being vague. LOL. The last thing anyone should ever accuse me of is believing the OT more than the NT when I have to tell Premills constantly that they should allow the NT to shine light on the OT for them. You are the one...

Your foolishness continues. I NEVER said anything about God's power ever being diminished and NEVER said anything about Satan's power being equal to God's. Satan's binding has nothing to do with that. You have nothing but lies to offer. Everyone can see that. You are pathetic. Scripture is very...