Search results

I would say this, and it sounds trivial at first, but if one has the 10 commandments hanging up in their house somewhere, there is a good chance you are walking by law. To walk by the law means it is the obedience to it or disobedience to it that causes you joy or grief. If you feel like you...

Well, yes I am. I am a member of the Catholic Church. And I am a Protestant. The oxymoron is "Roman Catholic". No such critter exists. Stranger

There is nothing to indicate that Peter was ever in Rome. Peters ministry was to the Circumcision. (2 Peter 2:7) Nothing in (1 Peter 5:13) indicates Peter was ever in Rome. The Church at Rome was already in existence by the time Paul got there. (Rom. 1:8,13) Stranger

Amen to that. Stranger

You're not listening. I have no problem with the Church being called Catholic. As I said, I am part of the Catholic Church. Stranger

The epistle of Clement is not Scripture. Why do you put such emphasis on something not Scripture? Yes, (1 Cor. 11:18-19) is about the problem of heresy in the Church. And why? So that division can be made of those who are approved and those who are not. Neither Peter or Paul established...

Yes, we Protestants are the 'separated brethren'. Stranger

Recognize that you're dead to self and live unto God. Placing yourself under the Law places yourself under the curse of the Law. Stranger

All you have shown me is that the Roman Catholic Church is not to be found in Scripture. Instead it is a product over time of the wrong teaching of many in the Church. Again, I have no problem with the Church being Catholic. It is Catholic. It just isn't Roman. Yours is Roman. The...

(1Cor. 11:18-19) Stranger

There is the Church at Rome but never a Roman Catholic Church. Calling the Church at Rome the Roman Church is equally correct. The Jerusalem council was Catholic. But it was not Roman. The Roman Church does exist. It had its beginning with the Church at Rome and has since turned into the...

Can you show me in the Bible where the Church at Rome is to be called the Catholic or Roman Catholic Church? No, you can't. Catholic speaks to the universal Church of Jesus Christ. Of which every believer is part of. They don't have to be part of the Church at Rome to be a part of the...

Reread my post. I told you. Stranger

No problem. I guess all I can say is that if one is speaking to God, that is a prayer. If you disagree there, then I have nothing more to offer. One can do it publicly and be wrong if he is doing it to be seen of men to glorify himself. But there are times when it is called for and one...

If I musunderstood, my apologies...on that point. Stranger

I have told you what a Romanist is. They are those associated with the Roman Church. Like you. Stranger

I did read it. You said you don't lean on nothing but the writings. And that is not tradition. Stranger

Oh, now you're going to blame your attitude on the Protestants. What would Romanists do if they didn't have the Protestants to blame. Stranger

That is a lie. You lean on tradition also. And some of the writings you lean on have no support. Stranger

The Jeusalem council wasn't the Roman Church. That the Church is indfectibile is accurate as far as the true Church is concerned. That the Church is the Roman Church is where the problem lies. You speak half truths. Another word for a lie. The Bible says to "mark them which cause...