Search results

I like creeds. They tell what a certain group believes . Sort of like a statement of faith which used to be found in the Protestant churches. I like and agree with the Apostle's Creed. Stranger

Sure they do. the Roman Catholic Church calls itself the Roman Catholic Church. They should just call themselves the Roman Church or the Church at Rome. They are not Roman Catholic, and they are not Catholic. Stranger

Soooo, you're saying that John the Apostle LIED to Polycarp, who then LIED to Irenaeus?? Ummmm, based on what - YOUR opinion?? And while were at it - are you really so ignorant as to NOT understand that there were Jews in Rome?? Why do you think that BOTH Apostles were there?? Irenaeus isn't...

Peter's ministry was to the circumcision. I wrote down the wrong verse. The correct verse is (Gal. 2:7-9) "But, surely you have heard that before. Or, is it possible this is the first time? "But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the...

I have no problem with the One Church. I have no problem with the Catholic Church. The problem is that the one Church the Catholic Church is not the Roman Church. It is not the Roman Catholic Church. Stranger

Wild Olive Concerning your definition of sin in (1 John 3:4), that is sin under the law. "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgession of the law." But under the New Covenant, sin is defined as anything not done in faith. "And he that doubteth is damned...

I know there are many who believe 'doctrine' is to be associated with being unspiritual. But it shouldn't be. It can be if your doctrine is false or wrong. But it is important to have and develop a good doctrine of what you believe. (Is.28:9)" Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom...

And, who are you talking to? Are you such a coward as to try and not name the one you are posting to? And here you have this avatar of some battle-tested soldier. What a facade. Do they teach this deception stuff in Roman schools? Stranger

All that you have said proves you don't have Scripture to support your claims. Only 'history' or 'tradition'. Stranger

I have already told you. Read again post #82. The standard of righteousness is defined in (Rom. 1:17). The law is spiritual. The inability lies in your ability to keep it. Stranger

No. Stranger

Haven't I already told you? post #82? Stranger

Early Church Fathers are not Scripture. And they were just as prone to error as you are. Stranger

No, we are not saying the same thing. If you want to please God by keeping the law, you will not please God. Because you won't be able to do it. But, go ahead, if that is your desire. Stranger

You need a plexotomy. Stranger

No, history and the Bible is your enemy. What do I care about your signature? Sorry but (1 Cor. 11:18-19) wasn't out of context. It was very clear. So was (Rom. 16:17). Stranger

kepha31 What's the matter, you need to sign my name to your posts (818)hoping for some credibility? Cheap. Do they teach deception in your Roman schools? Stranger

I may keep the commandments, but that is only due to my walk in the Spirit. In other words I am not trying to keep the 10 commandments but as I walk in the Spirit I will naturally be obeying those commandments because God is God and there is nothing wrong with the Law, just my inability to keep...

No it's not. Where is the evidence that Peter was in Rome? And what about (2 Peter 2:7)? There is nothing to show that Peter started any Church in Rome. And Paul is clear that he didn't start the church in Rome. Forget it. Romans is clear as I showed you. (Rom. 1:8,13) Actually, Jesus...

Repeating that mantra doesn't make it so. Stranger