Search results

In another post he referred to "Natural Israel" and "True Israel" (or "Faithful Israel"). But, he still insists that he only believes in one Israel. Go figure.

How ironic for you to say this about someone. You are so ignorant about your own holier than thou attitude. Take the log out of your own eye before judging others. You blatantly misrepresent what we believe and claim that we replace Israel when that is absolutely not the case. I am sure you...

LOL. I don't replace the single Israel that you consider to be the nation of Israel. I see another Israel besides that Israel. No, it is not. If it was, then why do I acknowledge the existence of the the Israel that you consider to be the only Israel? I don't replace it at all. I just recognize...

LOL. This thread is about giving reasons why full preterism is not true, but leave it to you to try to change the subject. Grow up.

Jesus did not come in 70 AD. When He comes at the last trumpet, the dead in Christ will be resurrected, all of His people will be changed to put on bodily immortality and all His people will be gathered to Him in the air (1 Cor 15:22-23;50-54, 1 Thess 4:14-17, Matt 24:30-31/Mark 13:26-27) and He...

I couldn't care less if you disagree with my claim. The text does not describe Jesus as handing the kingdom over to the Father, it describes Him as being given dominion over the kingdom, which is exactly what happened upon His resurrection and ascension, as Paul described in Ephesians 1:19-23...

Great job of missing the point. Well done.

He also saw a woman sitting on many waters while riding on a beast with seven heads and ten horns. So, we should take that literally in some sense, also?

Nonsense. Where do you get that idea from? Show me the scripture you use to back this up. You are basing salvation partly on one's end times doctrine, but such a thing is never taught in scripture. All who have faith in Christ and belong to Him will be caught up to Him after He descends from...

What in the world does this mean? Are you suggesting that when the rapture happens you think he won't be caught up to meet Christ in the air?

There's no doubt about the fact that you have no idea of what you're talking about. Tell me, how do you interpret this passage... 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with...

This accusation that you make towards Amillennialists of making "everything in His word an Allegory" is just a false accusation made from ignorance. Amillennialism is based on literal, clear, straightforward scriptures like these... Revelation 20 talks about the reign of Christ. Scripture...

You continue to misrepresent amillennialists. We are not replacing the normal definition of "Israeli" and "Jew". We believe in 2 Israels and 2 types of Jews. No one is replaced. If you want to continue wasting your time making that strawman argument, that's up to you, but it's time that you can...

Please stop being ignorant. Make more of an effort to learn what Amillennialists actually believe. There are some Amils, who are partial preterists, who might agree with what you're saying here, but there are many Amils who are not partial preterists and who do not claim that all of Revelation...

So, answer the simple question already. Who do you think Amils claim are being replaced and/or have been replaced? I don't know what you were intending to say here. Can you try again?

In this case, it translated the verse better. No English translation is perfect. The Bible was not originally written in English. So, any argument you make related to this topic is likely biased and weak because there is no basis for acting as if any English translation is perfect. But, the fact...

It's not what the New Testament says. You need to ask God for wisdom so that you stop believing this preterist nonsense (James 1:5-7). No, it does not. You lack the discernment to know when they were speaking from God's perspective and when they were speaking from man's perspective. Jesus...

YEP! You need to learn basic English. How can you not even know what the word "after" means? It says He would be cut off AFTER the end of the 69th week, not during the 69th week at the end of it. You are twisting scripture to make it say what you want it to say and you have no conscience about...

Translation: You have no idea of what you're talking about. LOL!