Search results

How ironic for you to say this to me. LOL! You are not to be taken seriously. I may have told you that before. But, it's 100% true. Your ignorance never ends. Like almost all words, it has multiple meanings. One of which is the physical elements of the universe or the sky, which is very...

No, they do not. Trust me. Everyone here can see how unhinged you are and not worth taking seriously with your incessant nonsense.

Your ignorance knows no bounds. How can you not know what I believe by now? I believe Jesus will meet us (His church) in the air and then proceed to take vengeance on all of His enemies left on the earth by burning them with fire. Then the judgment occurs, as He indicated will occur when He...

Yes, that is what He began reigning over when He ascended TO God the Father in heaven. Daniel 7:13-14 talks about the Son of man coming TO the Ancient of days, which is God the Father, and being given dominion. So, Ephesians 1:19-22 is very clearly talking about the same thing as Daniel 7:13-14...

You said covenant theology "is so confusing to me that I can't define it." and here you are defining it. Whatever. This thread is pointless.

That word is used in the following verse: Psalm 102:24 I said, O my God, take me not away in the midst (H2677) of my days: thy years are throughout all generations. Do you think David was asking God not to take him away in the exact middle of his life? No, of course he wasn't. So, the word can...

You accuse people of believing in replacement theology, but can't even answer a simple question about who Amils think is supposedly being replaced. Do you want to be taken seriously or not?

You are butchering the text in that verse and making it contradict the rest of the New Testament. Paul was not referring to two different gospels there in that verse. Here is a better translation of that verse: Galatians 2:7 (NIV): On the contrary, they recognized that I had been entrusted with...

Yep, just another lone wolf like the other many lone wolves on this forum who have views all to themselves and can't handle having their lone wolf views being challenged.

What is your understanding of Jews being blinded? Do you know that Paul believed that he could lead some of those who were blinded in his day to salvation? Romans 11:11 Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has...

There's a couple things relating to the context of 1 Peter 2:9 that I'd like to point out. 1 Peter 2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. 6 Wherefore also it is contained in the...

That is not what the prophecy indicates. Instead, it indicates that He would be cut off some time AFTER the end of the 69th week. Not at the end of the 69th week. Stop twisting scripture to make it say what you want it to say. That is inexcusable. Daniel 9:25 Know therefore and understand, that...

Wow. So judgmental. I was not looking to get into some dispute. I asked a simple, harmless question. I don't know what you meant by what you said, so I'm asking for clarification. You want me to just guess then? Do you mean to receive the scriptures as written literally or to receive them...

What do you mean by this exactly?

What in the world are you babbling about? Do you ever actually think before you post? That was his thread and those were his reasons to reject the premill doctrine. What is hard to understand about that? That thread has nothing to do with you personally. Where are you getting that idea from?

Remind us again of how you interpret the following passage. I need a good laugh... 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works...

He's all noise. He gets very loud in sharing his nonsensical opinions, but when he is challenged to address our arguments, he just runs away or avoids them at all costs.

Davy, like all premillennialists, doesn't accept the clear, straightforward teachings of Jesus and of New Testament scriptures like the one you shared here. They seem to think that they somehow have a better understanding of Old Testament prophecies than Jesus and the NT authors had because...

I don't. Are you somehow not aware that not all Amillennialists are partial preterists?

Jesus was crucified during the 70th week. Why do you not have His crucifixion occurring during any of the 70 weeks when it was so crucial to the fulfillment of that prophecy?