Search results

You don't understand that God has included Gentile believers in His plans that were only revealed in relation to the Jews in the Old Testament. It was a mystery back then, but is not a mystery anymore. Why is it still a mystery to you? Have you never read this... Ephesians 3:1 For this cause I...

Full preterism has absolutely nothing to do with Amillennialism. Stop being ignorant and educate yourself. You have no excuse for your ignorance.

That's weak. You don't address my arguments because you can't refute what I'm saying. Or he meant it from God's perspective like he talked about in 2 Peter 3:3-13. But, you don't even consider that because you're blinded by preterism.

No one takes you seriously. Remember that.

No, it is not. It's a complete joke. It denies the future glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ when He comes at the last trumpet to resurrect the dead in Christ and gather them, along with those in Christ who are alive and remain to Himself in the air after which we will...

Why are you asking about it then if you don't even have a definition for it? What are your thoughts on what I said about how I understand it?

LOL. Go away, little boy. To act as if there is no difference between full preterism and me agreeing with one thing that partial preterists believe while disagreeing with many other things they believe is utter nonsense. You apparently have no interest in being taken seriously.

You are so confused. In no way, shape or form did Paul indicate that what he saw, as described in 2 Corinthians 12 was the future new heaven and new earth. You are reading that into the text. No, he saw the current paradise/third heaven where Jesus, His angels and the souls of the dead in Christ...

Are you even reading the text? Compare these passages and note the obvious similarities: Daniel 7:13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. 14 And there was given him...

Do you somehow not understand that Luke's audience was different than Matthew's audience? Why would Luke record Jesus as saying "when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet..." while adding "let the reader understand" to a Gentile audience? They wouldn't have a...

So, I see you understand that Daniel 7:13-14 is about Christ's ascension. Daniel's visions were described in Daniel 7:2-14 and the angel explained them in verses 17-27. So, where in verses 17-27 do you think the angel explained the meaning of verses 13-14?

Daniel 7:13-14 is a clear reference to the ascension of Jesus to the right hand of the Father. It matches up with what Paul described in relation to Christ's resurrection and ascension in Ephesians 1:19-23. You do believe that Jesus has been reigning since His resurrection and ascension, don't...

This guy makes more sense than you do. Do you know that no one here takes you seriously?

Right. Full preterism is a joke and can't be taken seriously whatsoever.

Since it seems like many people have their own definitions for terms like these, tell me how you define "covenant theology". As I understand it, I certainly believe it's valid, but I don't know if my understanding of it matches yours. So, it's pointless to comment much further until I know how...

Do you understand that Daniel's visions were recorded in Daniel 7:2-14 and then the angel explained the meaning of them in Daniel 7:17-27? So, how do you interpret Daniel 7:13-14 and where do you think it is explained within Daniel 7:17-27? As for dancing around passages, that is what Premills...

As I just indicated in my previous post, Daniel 7:17-27 is the angel's explanation for the visions that Daniel described in Daniel 7:2-14. How do you interpret Daniel 7:13-14 and where do you think the explanation for the meaning of those verses can be found within Daniel 7:17-27? As for what...

There is a lot more to this than what covered in your original posts. It is not as simple as you're making it out to be. There are other much more clear, straightforward scriptures than this that can be used to form the foundation of your doctrine, but, for some reason, you choose to use some of...

If the end result of the ChatGPT reformatting of your words reflects what you believe, then I'm totally fine with you using ChatGPT for that purpose. I welcome you doing anything you can to make your points more clear since I sometimes can't figure out what you're trying to say.

Not surprisingly, you did nothing to address Scott's points and the scriptures he used to back them up. How do you reconcile anything you're saying here with scriptures like 2 Peter 3:3-13, 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10? As for Jesus ruling with a rod of iron, have you ever...