Search results

Right. Not only do they never talk about the future second coming (return) of Christ, but they also invent an imaginary coming of Christ in 70 AD and falsely claim that the imaginary "old covenant age" ended in 70 AD, when we know scripture never refers to a supposed "old covenant age" and we...

Dude. Look at my post again and see who I was talking to. It wasn't you. I was talking to Earburner. LOL. You never tire of embarrassing yourself for some reason. I have no interest in responding to what you said here since you're just repeating your normal script that I've already addressed...

That is the impression you gave. How about trying to be more clear then? What? Where do you get that nonsense from? The 62 weeks follow the 7 weeks relating to the command to rebuild and restore Jersusalem which happened long ago. LOL. His death does not end the 69th week and begin the 70th...

I agree completely. It's sickening to see the obsession with 70 AD that these preterists have. It's very difficult to believe when people like him claim to be a partial preterist rather than a full preterist because he, and the rest of the supposed partial preterists here NEVER talk about the...

What kind of ridiculous thing is this to say just because I was asking YOU for clarification. Are you trying to equate yourself with Jesus? If so, that is foolish. He had a reason for speaking in parables at the time He did, but that doesnt mean YOU should speak in parables or not be clear. Get...

Then why did you say those verses have something to do with never dying at all? Those who are alive and remain until Jesus comes will be immediately changed to put on bodily immortality, so they will not die. But, Jesus was not only talking about them in the verses you referenced. He was...

He was not addressing all Jews. Only those who rejected Him like the scribes and Pharisees that He had been calling hypocrites and vipers and such immediately prior to that. Yeah, so? He was addressing unbelieving Jews like the scribes and Pharisees He was rebuking in particular. No, He was...

It's from the NKJV. But, even the KJV does not agree with your understanding. In that translation Jesus is saying that someone can be dead ("though he were dead"), but will still live, meaning that death is not the end since there will be a future resurrection of the dead, which was the topic...

The context is related to 70 AD because it relates to the destruction of the city, Jersualem, and the sanctuary. But, we all know that you are not good at seeing the context of scripture. You have decided to believe that, but I see no basis for that claim. How can you understand that the first...

We don't have to assume that. If the 70 weeks started when we both agree that they started, then we should agree on when it ended as well because the prophecy was determined to end 70 weeks after it started. Daniel 9:24 says that 70 weeks were determined to fulfill the six things listed in that...

Well, we'll have to agree to disagree on that since it's clear to me that Daniel 9:24-27 only has to do with the people of Israel and the consummation of the judgment God made against them with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple. We are both Amils, so we do agree on what 2 Peter 3...

I still don't know what you're saying. Why not just be straightforward? Are you denying that 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 is in relation to bodily resurrections?

No idea of what you're talking about here. There is no reason at all to not just try to be clear when discussing things on this forum. I agree with that. Notice how Revelation 11:15-18 talks about the seventh trumpet signaling a number of things, one of which is the dead being judged, which we...

What are you talking about?

I believe that Daniel 9:27 refers to Jesus being cut off in the midst of the 70th week which ushered in the new covenant and made the old covenant animal sacrifices and offerings obsolete. That made the temple spiritually desolate even until the physical consummation of the destruction and...

This is total nonsense. Jesus is the male child of Revelation 12:5 who was to rule with a rod of iron and who was caught up to God and His throne. That should be obvious. The woman's other offspring are those who follow Jesus (Rev 12:17), so nothing you're saying fits what is written in...

Why can't you just answer my question instead of asking your own question? Answer mine first. I asked: What do you mean that the seventh trumpet "sounds the seventh day of God"?

You never seem to have any idea of what you're talking about. No, I do not say that mortal flesh and blood will inherit the kingdom of God. Paul made it clear that our bodies will be changed to be immortal when the last trumpet sounds (1 Cor 15:50-54), so we will inherit the kingdom of God with...

You have no evidence to support your claim that He was crucified immediately after the 69th week ended. None. You have NOTHING to back up your imaginary beliefs, as always. I didn't say that. I just said it's not spelled out to us explicitly. You certainly can't explain what it means. You've...

Yep. So? Plenty of Jews have believed in Jesus as their Messiah over the past almost 2,000 years, including 3,000 alone who put their faith in Christ and were saved on the day of Pentecost alone. You are misinterpreting that verse. What Jesus was saying there is that they would not see Him...