Search results

Give me a break. What do you mean "never encountering death at all"? Everyone He was speaking to in those verses physically died, so taking those verses completely literally makes no sense. What those verses mean is that those who believe in Him will never suffer the second death since that is...

Your post is pure trash and full of lies. Amillennialists believe that Jesus is God, so what in the world is the point of all that nonsense? You think slandering Amills and trying to lump us in with pagans helps your cause? No, it just puts you in danger of hellfire because of your judgmental...

Do you believe that Jesus was cut off (crucified) during the 70th week? When else could He be cut off since He was to be cut off AFTER the end of the first 69 weeks? There are no scriptures which tell us this explicitly, so no one can do what you're requesting here, including you. But, since it...

I can't help but wonder whether or not he believes in physical reality at all.

What in the world is this nonsense? It says the Messiah would be cut off AFTER the 62 weeks, which followed the first 7 weeks, so that places His death within the 70th week. There's nothing there which says His death would have to occur BEFORE the 70th week could begin. It says just the opposite...

LOL. Let's look at the text again, shall we? Mark 13:1 Mark 13:1 And as he went out of the temple, one of his disciples saith unto him, Master, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here! 2 And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left...

Not from you. That's for certain. No one who denies the existence of Satan as a real spirit being who tempted Jesus in the desert for 40 days and 40 nights and attempts to deceive others has anything to teach me. No one who tries to create a third group of people besides the saved and lost in...

Who said I haven't? You are the LAZY one who can't bother to answer even one of the questions that were asked. It's not like you have to answer all of them or none. Just answer one of them, Mr. LAZY BONES. And how about not being LAZY by not looking at the posts I referenced which show that Amil...

LOL! Nice job of using excuses for not being able to answer even one of the questions that were asked. You are so full of pride that you can't even acknowledge the FACT that the ECF Chiliasts did not believe many of the things that modern day Premils believe.

Why can't you answer even one of his questions? You think we aren't noticing that? Why are you so dishonest that you cant admit that the beliefs of those ECF Chiliasts had more in common with Amills than Premills? You have no clue of what you're talking about. Amillennialism is based on clear...

Those who are spiritually blind, like you, bore me. You're not talking about the Olivet Discourse, which is what I'm talking about. John 1:18-21 is not part of the Olivet Discourse no matter how much you try to make it so. Mark 13:1 And as he went out of the temple, one of his disciples saith...

No, I will continue to point out that you are childish. Sure, it does. With Christ or against Christ. Saved or lost. Wheat or tares. Sheep or goats. Righteous or wicked. Just or unjust. You just choose to ignore how the Bible categorizes people as it relates to salvation. Yes, it's apparently...

Ah, yes, Christ referred to His body when He talked about "these buildings" being destroyed just before the Olivet Discourse. Okay. LOL.

He couldn't even answer 1 of these 25 questions, but he tries to claim what you're saying is "wishful thinking". If that was the case, then surely he would be able to answer at least one or two of these questions, but he can't.

You didn't even answer one of his questions, so YOU are the one who has NOTHING to back up your claims about what the ECFs believed.

In other words, you have no evidence to show that any Chiliast pre-270 AD believed the same things that modern day Premils believe other than the timing of the thousand years. You have nothing to show that those chiliasts believed Satan would be bound when Christ returns or that they interpreted...

What a little child you are with your childish comments (duh, etc.). You are like a dispensationalist in that you try to create a third group of people besides saved and lost. Jesus said those who are not with Him are against Him (Matthew 12:30). Everyone is either with Him (saved) or against...

I don't know how else to see it when you try to claim you believe in free will and try to say you think it's possible for all to be saved and things like that which don't line up with your overall beliefs. If that was my intention, which it was not, then it clearly couldn't be considered...

Putting a huge gap within a prophecy that never said it would have any gaps is what I find to be unacceptable. It says in Daniel 9:24 that 70 weeks were determined to fulfill the six things listed in the verse. That means those six things would be fulfilled within a determined 70 week (490 year)...

LOL. You just repeat the same nonsense over and over again. You make everything more difficult than it needs to be. Jerusalem and its temple buildings were destroyed in 70 AD and there is plenty of historical evidence to back that up. The prophecy related to Daniel's people, the Israelites, in...