Search results

No deflection. And I never get over your refusal to discuss the subject honestly, such as actually answering questions. It is a real tell.

Yup. That’s were you lose me. Critical errors you make.

That was not my question. Obviously, you just want to repeat your mantra that contradicts what Thomas actually said (which was an exclamation) AND not answer my question. Your silence speaks volumes.

Because of the IDOLATRY associated with this translation, you will never get them to concede the translation is not divine.

Because there is no actual teaching of their doctrine, they must resort to doctrinally investing in ambiguous text. The more ambiguous, the more it serves their doctrinal purposes. Yes, Thomas exclaimed upon seeing the risen Lord. Who wouldn't? By contract, there is explicit Scripture that...

Never read Job huh?

Exclamations are anything but sloppy and irreverant speech. And it is no assumption or answer to my question. What set of circumstances would you accept one is making an exclamation if not seeing someone come back from the dead? :eek:

I'm pretty sure you know exactly what I'm saying. What does this verse mean to you? Whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, And whoever curses Israel will be cursed. Numbers 24:9

One wonders when you'll get your fill of antimsemitism, hating Jews?

Youre unbelieable. If true, there is no reason to use the KJV.

This has been debunked numerous times. THROUGH is not BY.

Sure he was. I wonder what set of circumstances would you accept one is making an exclamation if not seeing somone come back from the dead? :eek:

I often have to remind some folks that Jesus did not speak the King's English.

Jesus did not teach Thomas that. Is Thomas wrong? Exclamations are not statements of fact. When I drop my toast, butter side down, I am not actually claiming the toast is excrement.

Here is where the lack of intellectual integrity shows. Rather than admit better information justifies better conclusions, he holds tight to an unsupportable conclusion and resorts to conspiracy theories. This is the presise opposite of what philosophy, epistemology, teaches us. Aristotle...

There is no such part. Faith is believing what the Bible actually says - not illogically reading into it whatever you want.

Your math comprehension is very, very bad. Let's start at the beginning, the number line. 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9. It is not 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1. Notice that I have more than 3? 1^9=1. You really cannot give a reason for the obsession with 3 is 1 when it is obviously not. More to the point, is your...

Discovering an agenda from the past may seem like an agenda. As far as you denying the discovery of older manuscripts, just wow! Facts and truth should be important to one who claims to follow he who is truth.

Yup. That’s because 1 cannot be 3. It’s called logic.

Right on sister! It's so simple. rant/ While we are at it, for all those people who start all these threads "asking questions" about different denominations, we are saved by neither a book nor the "right" denomination nor "right" doctrine. Every religion has a book! What separates...