Search results

Read again. "My mothers children" (Ps.69:8) Stranger

I did read it. And I responded to what you said by saying that the virgin birth does all that you are wanting 'perpetual virginity' to do. Perpetual virginity doesn't affirm the holiness of the Lord Jesus. The virgin birth does. Perpetual virginity doesn't affirm the Deity of the Lord...

When the Roman church says things about Mary which elevate her to worship status, contrary to the Scripture, then Scripture plainly teaches against it. Was Mary a sinner? Stranger

Sure it does. I saw in #79 where your popular method of inteprtations is, "it doesn't mean what it says". Therefore you acknowledge that (Matt. 1:25) does say Mary sex after the virgin birth. But, we just can't believe what it says, according to the Roman method. Then couple that with...

I'm not diverting anything. Mary's perpetual virginity is not mentioned in Scripture. Instead, Scriptures teaches she did not remain a virgin. Thus the only reason for the Roman church to believe this is to elevate Mary to a status that is not hers. Which elevates her to status of...

(Matt. 1:25) (Psalm 69:8) compared to (John 7:3-5) Note in the Psalm it says, "my mothers children". Stranger

Yes, I know you have not said. Which is why I keep asking. I understand what the issue is. Which again is why I keep asking. If Mary's perpetual virginity is not necessary, or important, or fitting, then why do Romanists get so offended when it is proven in the Scripture that Mary was not a...

Again, nothing in Matt. 7:21-23 is addressing the 'Day of the LORD', or the dead in judgment. It is talking about the entrance into the 'Kingdom of Heaven'. List all the verses you like concerning the 'Day of the LORD'. They don't apply to Matt. 7:21-23. The 'Kingdom of Heaven' is not the...

I didn't call a humble attitude defeatist. I called the one who wants to say that we cant know because we were not there defeatist. Such manipulation. Your Roman brothers should be proud. So, are you saying the best lies of Romanist doctrine contains an 'element of truth'? I doiubt it...

Again, nothing says it is the judgement of the dead. Stranger

Christ said they knew. Do you need to know more? Unforgivable in heaven? Who said that? And, what is it that is unforgivable? Seems like doesn't pay the rent. Stranger

If it relates to things in the Scripture....whys is it mundane? Stranger

Was Mary a sinner? Stranger

Then answer the question. Why is it necessary for Mary to be a perpetual virgin. Stranger

Yes it does. Go back and read the other thread by this same title. Then explain why it was not proved that Mary did not remain a virgin and did have children. You can still read it, you just can't post on it anymore. First of all, not all Reformers believed in the perpetual virginity of...

It is not the amount of verses that is important. It is that it is written in the Bible that makes it important. This is one of the reasons we study the Bible; to learn what we don't know; to have God show us something that we didn't know before. In other words, to say we were not there so we...

My point is that the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, the unforgivable sin, can be committed today. Your comments in post #56 indicate that it was only a sin that could be committed under the certain circumstances existing when Christ walked this earth. What I am saying is, just as...

Yes I did. Stranger

Says you. Future? OK. What do you base (Matt. 7:21-23) as being a judgement of the dead? What false claims about the Church are you saying I am saying? Stranger

[removed] Mary's response that she had not known a man indicates she was a virgin. There is nothing there to indicate she would always be a virgin. There is nothing there to indicate she wanted to remain a virgin. There is no need for Mary to remain a virgin. She accomplished what the Lord...