Search results

Totally with you there.

I'm going to put something out there I hope you all will be open to. What I'm going to say doesn't change the gospel. It didn't twist it of give it a nuance that is foreign to good biblical understanding. Can we all agree that the gospel isn't just a new testament thing. From the garden of Eden...

Lol. Jesuit double speak. We don't object to the scriptures says he... Just the ones we don't approve of. We don't object to you reading the scriptures says he... Just don't come to any conclusions without our say so.

Not hearing or understanding the gospel, nor even hearing or knowing who Jesus is, does not preclude someone being saved because Jesus died for them. Let us not box God into our little set of theological formula and claim this one is saved because they completed a degree in being born again...

There will be no death either in heaven or the new earth. So every living creature both man and beast will be vegetarian as they were originally in Eden.

KJV Genesis 2:7 7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. The above does not say that man has a soul. He is a soul. Genesis 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature...

You may have something here, but let's be careful not to exclude someone coming out of left field with no pedigree whatsoever in the things of God and being saved. I know of pastors who's parents were totally atheist secular and even occultist.

You've discussed these matters before have you not on this forum?

No-one has suggested there is no lake of fire.

That is the gazillion dollar question my friend. And many in this forum I imagine would disagree on where our boundaries ought to be. Was Jesus lying or misleading the lawyer when He said, do this and you shall live? And how about this... Another lawyer asking a similar question... KJV Matthew...

Some I have read in the past would claim yes. But in a sense I can not in the slightest agree with. The parent's destiny according to some is to suffer interminably for eternity. Are we to believe that children but a year old, or even 10 or maybe a little older, will suffer as equally a long...

I think, like I said in a thread elsewhere, that love for God first, above and beyond our love for one another, should and will be the final test of faith. Only a genuine love for God will result in love for one another.

Freemasonry is presented globally by many experts in the field as the number one enemy of mankind, and indeed, their links to secret societies are numerous and well known. And we are also fully aware, or should be, that those same secret societies are all together and linked to one another...

So who is behind these temptations? Who is in charge of these trials and challenges that we are all facing today? “We will keep their lives short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite. We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so that they never see...

I think the time has come for me to leave this conversation lest you be tempted to dig a deeper hole than the above. Been nice chatting. God bless.

I can't offer a scriptural reason for believing this, is simply a conscientious determination. That parents whose children were not old enough to make their own decisions for Christ, and who die, are sanctified by their parents faith and will be reunited, the parents being able to raise that...

Like quiet said. Join the dots. The Bible explains itself.

Oh sorry. Just realized who said what and who wants what. My bad.

Hahaha. And you want to go back?????????

God is looking for the most faintest reason... The merest excuse... The most infinitesimal hint from any individual that He may come and receive him or her to Himself. A prayer, even the ever most humble and least theologically sound prayer is heard and answered in the most favorable manner...