Search results

I replied to another thread dealing with similar issues... The identity of Antichrist, false prophet etc. I think that what I said there, apply equally to this thread.

And living alone in the wop wops probably doesn't contribute a great deal toward sympathetic or empathetic conversations. Crocodiles don't really respond favorably to kind gentle sympathetic tones.

:rolleyes:

So. I haven't read every post in this thread, mainly because we've all been here before, and I don't really expect anything different. My apologies if someone has come up with some common sense exegesis. KJV 2 Peter 1:19-21 19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well...

Because God's word is truth because it is God's word. Taking our experience and going to God's word and searching for affirmation is dangerous because we can justify anything by taking the scriptures out of context. That doesn't mean the experience isn't real, taking such a stand would be...

There is a danger in interpreting scripture through the lens of experience.

My reading comprehension skills are excellent.

Good for you.

Clearly.

That is still a weak and childish response starkly illustrating you're inability to actually address the real issue. And now you're doubling down on your avoidance.

Or maybe not.

I will give you $10,000 if you can find in any of my posts any suggestion that we are justified by our obedience to the law. Your post is but another avoidance of the issue. If I said I don't murder anyone or dishonor my parents, would you then accuse me of attempting to be justified by the law?

Is that relevant? Can you not just respond to the posts, texts and, exegesis offered on their own merit?

Your biases don't refute or alter anything I said.

Your constant reference to your church as being 'holy', just because the scripture says God's church is holy, catholic, and apostolic, is a figment of your imagination. And your use of scripture to defend the indefensible, is itself indefensible. No-ones buying it.

Yep. Go through that thread and discussion and you will find at least 3 of us are of the same mind.

The first beast of Revelation 13 appeared as a leopard. This is a graphic depiction of a Grecian philosophy dominating the minds of those belonging to the beast... The Papacy. While Rome dominated the European world politically, those subject to that political power and those who inherited it...

Like I said. A bald faced fantasy to justify lies.

I know you were involved in a discussion on this topic previously. I just read some of your posts in that very discussion. Here is a link to one post that fully explains our position. And negates your weak attempt at refuting the idea. Thoughting again!....oh no, is that allowed?

Is he?