Search results

No, of course not. There is no reason to think that any future physical temple could possibly be the temple of God because He longer dwells in temples made with hands. Did you not read my post? That verse is about what happened in 70 AD. What "next temple"? Explain to me how God could possibly...

It's funny that you would try to keep getting me to respond, knowing that I'm just going to make a fool out of you and your false doctrine again if I do. You're a glutton for punishment, I guess. Yes, there's no such thing as luck to the Calvinist. My mistake. Unbelievers will not be tormented...

She is. It's part of their religion to pretend to be Christians in order to deceive people into thinking that there's no difference between what they believe and what Christians believe. But, Christians do not deny the deity of Christ as they do and do not try to claim that our deaths cover our...

There cannot be a future physical temple of God. God no longer dwells in temples made with hands. Why would He have any use for a future physical temple? He would not. Acts 7:48 Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet, Acts 17:24 God that made the...

Paul taught that believers will be changed to put on immortality in a moment at the sound of the last trumpet (1 Corinthians 15:50-54). I think the last trumpet will have sounded before they are judged, not after. I'm sorry, but this makes no sense. If they are heirs of eternal life, then why...

You seem to be contradicting yourself. You said "That being the case, Paul's statement that flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God has focused on the activity taking place after the millennial period.". But, now you're saying that the last trumpet sounds before the millennial period...

The temple of God is the church, according to Paul himself. So, why are you interpreting "the temple of God" differently here than how Paul described it elsewhere in his writings such as Ephesians 2:19-22, 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 and 2 Corinthians 6:16?

Do you see the descriptons of Him smiting the nations and treading them in the winepress of God's wrath? Interesting how you didnt even mention that. Him ruling the nations with a rod of iron comes from this prophecy... Psalm 2:8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine...

If Jesus reigns over them then doesn't that mean they will be among His sheep who inherit eternal life in the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world (Matthew 25:31-46)? And how does this line up with other scripture which says that Jesus will come unexpectedly as a thief in the night...

We're still waiting for the scales to fall off your eyes so that you can join us in the new covenant church that has been saved by Christ's blood of the new covenant.

There's nothing there in 2 Thessalonians 2 about the man of sin being resurrected from the dead. You are just making things up in your imagination.

No, He will not. It's interesting how you couldn't be bothered to post the text. I wonder why... Isaiah 14:18 All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house. 19 But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those...

Right. She's contradicting herself as Jehovah's Witnesses are known to do.

Right. In terms of the bodily immortality that we will inherit (1 Cor 15:50-54), that will result in eternal life. We cannot die after that. I can't make sense of anyone saying otherwise.

Only God can resurrected the dead and He will not be resurrecting any "little horn person" from the dead. That is complete nonsense. There is no reason whatsoever that God would want to do such a thing.

That's rather evil of you to purposely try to bother me. That seems like something a wicked person would do. But, don't worry about it. You believe you are predestined to eternal salvation, so you can sin all you want and it won't make any difference. No need to repent of wickedly trying to...

I, of course, disagree with which covenant it's talking about there, but I agree with you in the sense that it was made long before it is confirmed. The Light doesn't seem to know the difference between making and confirming a covenant.

I didn't disagree with that point. Hello? I'm saying the covenant/promise doesn't have to have been originally made at the same time that it is confirmed. For example, the new covenant was made by God well before it was confirmed by Jesus. That's what I believe Daniel 9:27 is about, but I know...

It's talking about the confirming of a covenant. The covenant/promise can have been previously made before it is confirmed.

The verse is talking about confirming or putting into effect a previous covenant (promise) that was made.