Search results

What would be a better anaolgy; that God is not a rapist and does not violate people's will to die? IMO invoking the "Who can resist him?" to support universalism is tenuous, at best.

I did not make a claim, just stated a logical train IF-THEN. You are the one who is failing to provide any Scriptural evidence that someone who rejects Christ will still be saved.

People today forget the application of slavery was a merciful response to the people starving to death in Egypt. They had nothing else to exchange for food. People do not want to recognize that slavery is an economic system that still works to this day, even if we are appalled by it. In the...

Hmmm. Obviously, this reveals the demonstrable error in those who claim equality in the Godhead. Another blatant lack of equality is the lack of a personal name: Father = Highest title in Scripture, God = YHWH Son = Highest title in Scripture, Son of God = Jesus HS = No title (Perhaps...

The stiff-necked, hard hearted. Some dogs have to be put down - even though they are generally man's best friend.

If this were true, universalism would be true and there'd be no benefit to believing that Jesus is the Anointed One.

Yea, when was the last time Demon-rats defended "White Supremacists" on the grounds that it doesn’t mean all people of that particular political label are bad.

Appeal to Majority/ALL. The fallacy of perfection. If there is only one exception, it makes the rule.

Ideology before facts and logic. Gotcha. Listen, a great defense feminists use is to hide behind women. An attack against feminism is deflected as an attack against women. So, a friend of mind developed a mantra that even you can understand. LOVE WOMEN HATE FEMINISM

I have to take another bite of this apple. I know another poster rejected the claim that Paul was angry. However, let's explore Paul's emotions, in particular, and men's emotions, in general ... For decades feminists have been claiming they want men to be more emotional. Here the truth is...

That’s your take on it?! Good grief.

I’m so sorry Nancy. My prayers are with you

Not even the Apostle can put women in their place. Such is the unhealthy lack of humility emanating from feminists.

Your scenario is worse than a lie but an anti-truth. If you cannot accept feminists opposition to slut shaming, it shows how thoroughly ideological you are. You still cannot admit one little bit how feminism has failed women.

That's the rub. What verse says that?

Therein lies the double standard and hypocrisy of feminism. You cannot condemn sexist except for when it benefits you (then you want pro-sex movements) and be taken seriously.

This is an awesome vid. With feminism, men and women don't need each other any more. Then what is the basis of the relationship? Relatively superficial desire. The author goes on to point out the paradox that society encourages us to hold out for the infinite potential of the perfect made, yet...

Yes.

Agreed but this is for those who do not reject later.

More Ex Post Facto reasoning. God does not want anyone to perish, true? But this does not mean universalism is correct doctrine. It means some will perish even though God does not wish it. A little bit of word play to equate "God's Elect" with those whose name is written in the Book of Life...