Search results

Its perspective is all of existence. How all of nature and all his word point to God’s glory. Atheists got nothing.

99.9%. They are incapable of expressing an original thought. That’s the nature of indoctrination.

You're projecting - again. All you do is deny the evidence to maintain your false beliefs. From 'Real Face of Jesus' Revealed in Newsmax Magazine The shroud has been a subject of controversy for some time, but Chandler says major media have largely ignored the new scientific and forensic...

Insolent, especially on a Christian site.

Cultural Marxism I'm saying Cultural Marxism is evil - and you are indoctrinated in it.

Well, you certainly have the Leftists talking points down. Yet, you completely fail to defend the BLM racist agenda or the LBGT sexual deviancy agenda. The Cultural Marxist talking point is to pretending the only basis for opposing it is "phobia," which is patently untrue. See my post on triply...

How the heck did you get on the - we can only talk about salvation - track from this sentence I responded to?

The word is principled. I wrote a principled response. Why do you suppose the details of the OP story must be included with every post? It's not primarily about reconciliation but forgiveness. We've already covered this ground. It takes one to forgive and 2 to reconcile. As I understand the...

Yet, history since then shows it to be true. Not all truth is in Scripture, such as New World.

Sounds like? Who is the center of our lives? A. God B. People who reject Christ? C. People who imperfectly apply Christs commands?

It's AND, not or. Their statement is a triply illogical. 1st, not all emotions are irrational. Appeal to Emotion. 2nd, it supposes the only basis to oppose their agenda is emotional. False Alternative. 3rd, it supposes the emotional response to their agenda is irrational. Ad Homenim. Truth...

Correct. Just saying those who oppose a premise are irrational does not automatically make your premise correct. Otherwise, You are Christophobic, means Christian ethics is automatically right and you wrong for opposing it, right?

Wow! That says a lot. I suppose revival is all about seeing things anew.

Using 'phobia' to make the arguement in defense of sexual perversion fallacious Ad Homenim. Could we be phobic AND such sexual persion STILL be wrong?

Not If it were BLM protesting or LGBT protesting Cameron’s story books.

I wrote almost the exact same post a few months back. I am impressed with the egomaniac's ability to use Scripture. Let me do a parody of Jack and Jill. Epi 1:1. Jack and Jill went up the hill. They traveled by walking. They traveled up. This is as clear as could be that they walked up...

The more I read about great people who inspire me, I learn who inspired them. This deepens my appreciation for greatness. The King inspired the Queen, who inspired Pearl to write a wonderful poem for all of us to enjoy and reflect on. I'd love to chat with you about this, as Rita said, in a...

I’m not saying anything like not doing this. For some reason, you are equating boundaries with the absence of love.

Psalm 19 is my favorite Psalm.

Agreed. In the youtube vid Is Genesis Real, the narrator explores the notion of paradigm. Both groups of scientists are looking at the same set of facts. It's just that the Atheist scientists and Christian scientists have different paradigms to explain the facts. Regarding the flood, the...