Search results

Agreed! The Holy Bible testifies Jesus is NOT God. It only says God the Father - in every Epistle, over and over again. For us, there is one God, the Father. Jesus says the Father is his God, the only true God. In addition, the Holy Bible repeatedly tells us Jesus was a man and like all men...

That is the Strawman. Except the Angels that didn’t meet the standards is your Strawman that they did.

Yes.

Not at all. ‘The Lord’s Day’ is the new creation through Christ which parallels the original Creation of God.

Strawman. ‘Special honor’ a Sabbath does not make.

It is not an assertion. The organization as now constituted did not begin until the 12th century. The connection to Peter as the 1st Pope is specious. And there is no Apostolic writing that supports the RCC Hierarchy as currently constituted.

LOL

You no capisce. It's true that the source of shoes is the shoe story but the topic of conversation is how saints twisted their ankle. Why do you keep talking about the source? You no capisce! I'll post it again so your obtuse inner processes can ponder that @Phoneman777 made it pretty clear the...

No. It is supposition on your part as a desperate attempt to create a Strawman, for reasons that are not entirely clear. Except for all the times I was wrong, I have always been right also. The desperateness of your position grows with each passing sentence you write. Wrong. You cannot just...

All? I simply asked what verse says what you claim. Simple. Obviously, you cannot provide the verse because it does not exist. As a poor substitute, you engage in artifical sythnesis; a piece of a verse out of context, here; a piece of a verse out of context, there. It is so cumbersome and...

Jesus did not ask Peter once if he loved him. He did not say to forgive once. God created, then recreated via Noah then created a 3rd time through Jesus. Scripture is filled with multiple attempts on God’s part. I think you are confusing the responsibility, not to merely throw to the wind, but...

What verse says that?

If that were true, 1/3 of the Angels would not have rebelled against God.

Shocked to read this reply @Phoneman777. The I realized that Bruno is another mystic. "Somehow" his ex-post facto theology makes sense. You will not open his ears or eyes. :( @Phoneman777 made it pretty clear Scripture is not talking about God's agape but the agape of the saints. Maybe you no...

Yea, right! What are you apolozing for? Mocking. And you admitted you are still mocking me. Not too sincere. ? Comments are not dodged. Questions are dodged. My comment is this thread on heresy has changed in your mind to me. It's so funny that you presume to use a pet name for me...

Me too. It's what the verse needs to speak to the person at that time.

Hmmm, maybe. It depends. There is a political theory that actually applies to any controversial idea. Given that one holds a false or bad or incorrect idea, it takes them time to be repeatedly exposed to a better idea before accepting that idea. The theory states it takes 20 interactions to...

Pot. Call Kettle Black. What Scripture does not say in any manner, shape or form is God is 3in1 with 3 persons making up a Godhead. This is true not matter your line of inquiry - or to what language you retreat.

Please explain more. :)

I'm sorry if I missed this but has the conversation expressed equality between 'not having a sin nature' with 'being incapable of sin?" I ask because I see these as different, one is actual; the other is potential. One is the risk of wrong doing exists; the other displaces the risk with actual...