Search results

Please tell me exactly how you interpret this passage: 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be...

LOL. What a lie. I addressed the topic in detail in my original post and in other posts as well. You are the one avoiding what I said in the original post. You haven't specifically addressed any of those passages. You've only vaguely mentioned them without exegeting anything. Talk about amusing...

He expects me to specifically address all of his points even though he did not specifically address any of mine. That isn't reasonable. I'm not into one way discussions like that. If he wants to be taken seriously, then he should be able to show how his view can be reconciled with the NT.

You do what you want, but I'm looking forward to what Peter said we should be looking forward to. 2 Peter 3:13 But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells.

Do you just ignore this passage that also mentions them coming from the north and south? Luke 13:28 “There will be weeping there, and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God, but you yourselves thrown out. 29 People will come from east...

You have no clue. Period. That's obvious. I don't need to take someone like you, who undermines Paul's teachings on prophecy, seriously. So, I won't.

And I'm sure that despite creating two posts, you most likely will not actually specifically address anything I said in my original post if you do what you normally do. Let's see if I'm right. I haven't read anything beyond this yet. Not necessarily, but I do believe everything we need to know...

You say we have the second most important resurrection resurrection missing altogether in Revelation 20, but you premils have the most important resurrection missing altogether in Revelation 20. So, if determining the truth of Revelation 20 is based on something like that, then you just proved...

Your lack of discernment is truly stunning. He was figuratively making a reference to how the kingdom of heaven/God would become open to the Gentiles in the rest of the world because of the preaching of the gospel. Up to that point, God's word was only known in Israel (for the most part), so...

You clearly have no understanding of context whatsoever. You prove that repeatedly This is what you do. You are completely dishonest with scripture. When I prove your wrong about something, you come up with something new to try to keep your doctrine afloat. I guarantee that you thought verse 7...

Can you tell me why you are so delusional? Your arguments are completely incoherent and are the weakest arguments I've ever seen on any topic in my life. And you think you owned him? LOL. You're not living in reality. You are in completely over your head here. You are in way over your depth. You...

It's all he ever does. His arguments are completely incoherent and he is completely incapable of addressing any of our points. I can't take him seriously at all.

LOL. You can't be serious. You don't even know how to debate. You make all kinds of claims, but don't exegete any scripture. You do nothing to explain what you're saying. You are in completely over your head here. Your arguments couldn't be weaker if you tried. No one takes you seriously here...

You're responding to the topic with complete nonsense about having to travel east from Canada to the kingdom of heaven and other nonsense like that. You have no discernment whatsoever and take everything out of context. And you deny what the scriptures I showed teach. You can't be taken seriously.

No, I did not. Your point was that the verse doesn't say all and it does. Your posts contain nothing more than weak arguments. You are delusional to think otherwise. Your conscience is clear despite lying and saying that I hate Revelation 20 even though I absolutely do not? It seems you have...

Yes, I did. It's pointless to talk to you since you can't read without charts.

LOL. Please stop wasting your time. I'm done dealing with your nonsense. I'll wait for people to join this thread who actually want to have a serious discussion about this topic. Thanks.

He apparently has no conscience. He has a much more serious problem than believing in his false end times doctrine. He needs to learn that lying is a sin and that he needs to repent of his sin. And how funny is it for the guy who believes God reveals truth only to him to accuse me of being arrogant?

Nice job completely missing the point. Maybe you can show me where Jesus said that what He said in John 4:19-24 would no longer be true?

Okay, so I guess we need to end the discussion then. As I should have done well before now. Your beliefs are utterly ridiculous and not worth wasting any more of my time on. I feel bad for those from the north or south who cannot enter the kingdom of heaven. You say tough luck to them because...