Search results

We fundamentally disagree. Jesus is not God. Jesus is not the Creator. You do not seem to comprehend the proof of this is that Jesus died. Right! The word of God was made flesh - God was not made flesh. See the difference?

Big questions. I don't understand your question about my salvation. Please clarify. Regarding how I see the cross; I see it as a test of ones humility. If one cannot accept the (sacrificial) work of Jesus is why we are saved - as opposed to our own work, we fail the test.

I don't believe the purpose of the church is to correct error. If it were, I would have NOTHING to do with such an eternally hateful organization. Instead, I believe the purpose is to live in fellowship, loving God & each other.

Which has nothing to do with Jesus endorsing religious liberty of those who do these things - though not a part of his church. Notice what Jesus says here, only those who do the will of my Father (shall be saved)". Jesus does not say, only those part of the 11th century institution will be saved.

You cannot even speak without a forked tongue on the nature of the virus. If it be minor in some ways, admit that. If it be not minor in some ways, admit that. Who is making the claim that the falsely named "vaccine" is a minor issue? No one. I will die rather than take it. Others, such as...

Exactly. Your 'rationalizations' are opposite of logic as they invoke logical fallacies. Look it up.

From Merriam's beget verb Save Word To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In be·get | \ bi-ˈget , bē- \ begot\ bi-ˈgät , bē- \ also begat\ bi-ˈgat , bē- \; begotten\ bi-ˈgä-tᵊn , bē- \ or begot; begetting Definition of beget transitive verb 1: to procreate as the father

Revealing trinitarianism is a mocking spirit. Again with my question you have yet to answer:

This is an example of what I mean about attacking. You are so busy 'splainin how I'm wrong, you can't take a compliment! I like the part of the Mass where they offer the sign of peace. I know it's not doctrine. It's a part of your God forsaken 11th century institution that I like. I mentioned...

I have showed you in Scripture repeatedly. You do not have eyes to see or ears to hear.

Here is a great example of the improper use of language. Scripture tells us, Jesus tells us over and over again that he is a man. It does not say he took on the appearance of a man. Theologically, what you write destroys the very heart of the Good News. If Jesus were the Creator who only...

What makes me see it that way? People don't live through others, period. It is figurative language. There is not some kind of biological process by which one lives for themselves while others live for others. It is a way of saying the ideals, say of motherhood, make the mother live for the...

I agree. Neither is it up to you to equate trinitarianism with Christianity.

I've answered. It's just your questions are nothing but forms of attack, one logical fallacy after another. Yet, you do not answer my questions. Admit there is no trinity verse like above in Scripture? Why trinitarians make this absent doctrine their central principle, to violate the 1C?

See below - and stop changing the subject.

That's what I meant. Is it your intent that speaking boldly is proper use of language?

Putting you down 'for your own good' no doubt. o_O

Friend, there is a difference between being righteous and self-righteous. Nothing is worse on Earth than a self-righteous religious do-gooder, who is not bothered by a guilty conscience.

Salvation v sanctification?

Putting aside your Middle English reference as a standard for proper English, it seems to me that "Christ lives in me" is metaphorical. For some reason, you seem to assert that speaking boldly is proper English. Is that your intent?