Search results

Didn't I already make it clear multiple times that I think you are clueless and it's a waste of my time responding to your nonsense? I'm pretty sure I did. So, don't waste your time talking to me, either. Denying that the passage is talking about the future second coming of Christ is ridiculous...

Why do you think that two passages have to contain all the same details in order to be referring to the same event? That's ridiculous.

What a surprise. Another thread about pretrib results in another thread where pretribs refuse to exegete scripture and back up their claims with scripture. Who could have predicted this? :wink:

I'd like to expand on what you said here by showing exactly what scripture indicates will happen to those, like the foolish virgins, who say "Lord, Lord, open to us" when Jesus comes again. Pretribbers claim that such people will be allowed to continue living during a time of tribulation after...

LOL!!! I said a few. That would've been sufficient. If you actually accepted what the NT teaches, then you would accept that while it was hidden in the OT, the fact of the matter is that Gentile believers are fellowheirs with Israelite believers of God's promises (Ephesians 3:1-6) and that God...

LOL. Are you trying to miss the point? Hebrews 11:8-16 makes it quite clear that God had something even better in mind for His people than just that piece of land. Abraham, Isaac and Jacob understood this, so why can't you? God's people will all inherit the entire new earth. But, you want to...

You are assuming that Rev 20 happens after Rev 19. I disagree with that. Hello? Did you somehow not already know this? It seems that you have no interest in making any attempt to understand Amil. You are trying to debate against something of which you have no understanding. It's like you trying...

LOL. That's complete nonsense. So, you believe everything you read on the Internet then? Says a lot about you. Can you try to stop being lazy and take more than a few seconds to research these things? All you have to offer is false accusations. I can barely take you seriously. That's because...

Of course that's what it's saying. You apparently completely missed the point. The point is that it is the new Jerusalem and the new heavens and new earth that we should be looking for in fulfillment of God's promises and not a piece of land in Israel. Abraham, Isaac and Jacob came to understand...

LOL. I'm on topic. You used your flawed man-made rule to try to prove that the thousand years must be literal because it has a beginning and an ending. So, I'm putting that rule to a test. And you're trying to avoid admitting that your man-made rule is flawed and should be discarded. So, will...

Once again you are pitting scripture against scripture and causing contradictions. Why do you do that? Have you no shame? Your interpretation of Ezekiel 39:2 directly contradicts what John wrote here: Revelation 19:17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the...

Says the guy who doesn't acknowledge what happens to those, like the foolish virgins, who will say "Lord, Lord, open to us" when Jesus comes. Instead of acknowledging that they will be cast into the lake of fire where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, you say they are Christians...

I was done talking to you and indicated as such and you replied to me again, anyway. So, ask yourself the same question. And, with this, I'm done wasting any more time talking to you because there's no need to refute things that only you believe, anyway. There's no point to it.

And in the hearts of those who are in the church? Paul wrote that He is the head over all things in the church (Ephesians 1:22). Agree? In that same verse he also said all things are now under Christ's feet. Agree? Scripture teaches no such thing. Have you never read this: Hebrews 11:8 By...

In other words, you can't refute what I said. But, you're too stubborn to admit that you interpreted the verse wrongly.

LOL! Are you a comedian by chance? Is that what you do for a living? This was a good joke. You are a premil whether you claim to be or not. LOL. Premil simply means you believe the thousand years occurs after Christ returns. That's what you believe. I happen to believe what those who are called...

LOL. The cattle on a thousand hills refers to literal cattle, not God's people. This shows how reckless you are in interpreting scripture. Did you even look at the verse? Psalm 50:9 I have no need of a bull from your stall or of goats from your pens, 10 for every animal of the forest is mine...

LOL. I showed how your logic doesn't work in relation to Daniel's 70 weeks. No response from you. Why not? And I asked you this with no response: Is the following verse referring to a literal one hour? Revelation 17:12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no...

If only they would just humble themselves and reconsider what they believe after it is pointed out how weak their arguments are and how they are unable to exegete scripture and provide coherent arguments even after repeatedly being asked to do so. Instead, they just get frustrated that they...

You've never explained why he would supposedly be deceptive about that verse when there's no reason to be. Luke 21:33-36 clearly supports Amil because it has His wrath coming down in one day (the day He returns) and not over the course of a year as you falsely believe.