Search results

No, I am not. You always resort to lies when you have nothing else to offer. Any honest believer will admit that no mortals can survive what is described in 2 Peter 3:10-12. I have said several times now that I believe the "few men left" are believers because scripture teaches that there will...

No, I saw the point. Obviously, just randomly making a reference to a time period non-literal can result in some ridiculous interpretations, but no one is doing that. It's not a point that needed to be made. This is not how to interpret scripture. Are any of those other usages of the word...

You're missing the symbolism in that passage, also. Your hyperliteral approach to scriptures contained in highly symbolic books is unwise. Explain the logistics again of how a number of people around the world who number "as the sand of the sea" will all travel to one place to attack "the camp...

Yep. Not saying otherwise. What I was saying is that it was built up again in the form of the New Testament church. And this all relates to John 6:39 how?

Right. The everlasting fire (lake of fire, furnace of fire) is not literal fire, but symbolically refers to God's wrath that will be upon the devil, his angels and those whose names are not written in the book of life for eternity. It was originally prepared for the devil and his angels and they...

LOL. Because you didn't ask me that question. It was a question you asked WPM. So, what did you mean when you said "If that is blank check to say any length of time is not really what it says, then who's to stop me from saying Jesus will be in the grave, not for three literal days, but for...

The tabernacle of David represents the temple of God. The church. Built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets with Jesus as its chief cornerstone (Eph 2:19-22). I'm trying to get you to explain how that has anything to do with John 6:39. You can't answer that simple question?

Right. It's not surprising that he would do that after having already misrepresented Amil as if our doctrine is based on allegorized scriptures when the fact of the matter is that our doctrine is based on clear, straightforward scripture. We use that foundation to help interpret more difficult...

Did you miss my question? Please answer my question first and then I'll answer yours. You had said "If that is blank check to say any length of time is not really what it says, then who's to stop me from saying Jesus will be in the grave, not for three literal days, but for 3,000 years?". So...

Are you a broken record? I already addressed this. The context of John 6:39 is not raising up the tabernacle of David, but rather resurrecting those who believe in Christ that the Father gives Him. Why don't you show how you think the tabernacle of David is in view in John 6:39 instead of just...

LOL!!! Why are you so naive? You STILL don't even know what amils believe. What is the excuse for your ignorance? We, unlike you, do not interpret Revelation 20:7-9 to be talking about all the saints literally being gathered together in one place on the earth. We believe it symbolically...

The scriptures are true, but your interpretations of them are false. Your arguments are incredibly weak. You have nothing else? You expect people to believe that mortals can survive what is described in 2 Peter 3:10-12. LOL. Ridiculous. Only extreme doctrinal bias can lead someone to believe...

Nonsense. You are making the text say what you want it to say. No mortal can possibly survive what is described in 2 Peter 3:10-12. Paul said regarding the same event in 1 Thess 5:2 that "they shall not escape" without giving any indication that any of them would escape. How could they when fire...

Yes, of course I know what it was. John 6:39 has nothing to do with that. Look at the verse again: John 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. This is from the KJV. What was...

LOL. Of course you would. Because of your huge ego, you can't even bring yourself to acknowledge that the word "thousand" can be used figuratively in scripture, including Revelation 20, even though it is used figuratively several times. May He have mercy on your soul for saying this. His Spirit...

This is a weak argument to make regarding a passage found within the most highly symbolic book in all of scripture. So, is it your view that the following verse is referring to a literal one hour of time then? Revelation 17:12 “The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a...

This is just complete nonsense and a case of taking scripture horribly out of context. The few left are believers, not unbelievers. Few are chosen (Matthew 22:14). You don't accept that everything and everyone on the entire earth will be burned up when Jesus returns, but that is what scripture...

Nonsense. That doesn't fit the context of what He was talking about at all. You seem to be someone who insists on being wrong about everything.

Is this referring to 1000 actual generations? Deuteronomy 7:9 Know therefore that the Lord your God is God; he is the faithful God, keeping his covenant of love to a thousand generations of those who love him and keep his commandments. Is this referring to 1000 actual hills? Psalm 50:10 for...

Of course I don't accept your answers that I disagree with. Then they lose their part or share in the first resurrection. Regardless, surely the dead in Christ, whose souls are now in heaven, do not need to be bodily resurrected in order for the second death to not have power over them, right...