Search results

You are operating under a false premise. That individual choice is independent of submitting to the will of God and salvation. Life. Death. They are indeed extreme positions. However, leaving it at that is absurd for God begins with life, specifically the choice to choose life through him over...

General message? How does keeping things pure square with the jelly fish DNA angle?

No. You only appealed to Diversion. "Other issues" is not an explanation of why killing babies is a God-inspired "choice."

What does Scripture say on this subject of making hybrids?

Right. Where in Scripture does God command us to choose death over life - through his son? It's not about me or my opinion but the truth of God's Word. Make a blessed day.

The quantity of issues is a Diversion. This entire thread is about the lie as one party DOES represent Jesus more than the other on this most important issue. The entire story of the Bible can be summarized as Choose Life. Violate that, and you are lost to the core.

Incorrect teaching is worse. You don't know who God's Anointed is? This is the meaning of Christ; the meaning of Messiah. (The VOICE translation, which I tend to use does not use the terms Christ or Messiah but God's Anointed to remind us it is his title and not his last name, like Ben...

Mentioned in today's sermon. Man does not find a way to God; God makes a path for man.

heresy is merely a teaching that deviates from ones standard (denomination). An example is OSAS. Incorrect teaching is one that goes against the Word of God. An example is salvation by means other than through Gods Anointed.

Agreed.

I do when the laws are not righteous. MLK said we have a moral obligation to obey moral law and a moral obligation to not obey immoral law.

i took the point to be would God allow women to fornicate? The text is written restricting one sex but I believe it is implied to apply to both.

Government entitlements are not equality programs. Who the entitlements are for and who they are not for have to be defined to be practically administered.

Yet, the government has re-defined marriage.

No where does the Bible teach Jesus is divine. The way we know Jesus is not God is that he died. Trinitarians claim of Jesus divinity is so weak they have to resort to 1:1 of John, which does not even mention Jesus - or God becoming incarnate. None of John’s Gospel can be used to make this...

it surely is an attribute using “this” rather than “he” in John 6:60.

v14 does not say God became flesh. His word was put in this adopted son in Fulfillment of Deuteronomy 18:15-18

I’ll take God’s word over your doctrine.

Absolutely not. It’s about expanding the entitlement class or not.

oh the irony.