Search results

While quoting Scripture is cool, it does not answer my question. Why don't you try answering the question using your own words (with Scriptural quotes in support if you prefer) but consider this logical quandary. P. Being A died. P. To die means to have no capacity for independent action. C...

OK. I'll ask her this weekend.

I wasn’t talking to you.

Meaning is in the eye of the beholder. I can see your faith wholly depends on disputing beyond reason. Just because something is disputed does not make it untrue.

Not an answer to my question.

I JUST answered it in post #190.

Hmmm. Yea, let's abandon how trinitarians use things supposedly tied to 3 even when it is learned they are not tied to 3, like 5 states of matter. Mic drop. I guess you don't want to recognize how the reality undermines the doctrine. You double down, even things that are not tied to 3 - you...

No. Anything can be 'disputed' beyond all reason. This is why the legal standard to convict someone of a crime is beyond reasonable doubt, not ANY doubt. The question is; why would hundreds of people give testimony to Jesus fulfilling 356 prophecies of what they saw with their own eyes, if...

Yea, OK. About 7 Spirits?

So. God is dead in your estimation?

I like how trinitarians stop at 3 to support their doctrine. There are 5 states of matter. Matter: Definition & the Five States of Matter | Live Science There are 7 Spirits of God in Rev 1:4 but that's not 3.

I think so. Still, I present Jesus fulfilling 356 prophecies and you claim 6 don’t apply. So, that makes the other 350 not valid? LOL

Not all prophecies have already come true. Notice how you did not quote an actual verse in Scripture?

Agreed. We can take that one of the list.

Notice how you do not actually quote Scripture in making that claim?

Appeal to Diversion. The point here is, given the prophecies, what are the odds Jesus is NOT the Messiah? Anyone can ‘dispute’ the conclusion. The question is about the analysis; what are the odds he is not the Messiah all things considered?

Claiming irreducible complexity is a weak argument does not make it so. It completely violates Darwin’s theory of random variation over time, where variation gives competitive advantage. I’m not denying there is NO CHANGE over time. The issue here is the origin of the irreducible complexity...

I think I've answered this question from you more than a dozen times ...Words are WHAT's not WHO's. The word of God is an attribute of God, just like the word of the President is an attribute of the President. Rather than try to force an interpretation onto the text, you need to look at it in...

The proof is John 1:1 does not even mention Jesus.

Do you go where the evidence leads? Did you read Evidence to Be Seen? Unbelievers have a shocking arrogance and ignorance of where the evidence leads. Science is a natural ally of believers. This is because science studies the Works of God. In fact, before the 19th century, the greatest...