Search results

YOu also need to remember that Jesus has existed from eterntiy past. Only His humanity was formed in the womb, not His divinity. and while Jesus did act in the role of prophet- that is a subordinate role to Him being Savior and god the Son.

Well the church has no specific Sabbath! We have entered into divine rest as it says in Hebrews and also as Paul said in Romans 14: 4 Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand. 5 One...

Well the New Jerusalem is for eternity! Now you have the church being symbolic walls, streets and gates in eternity. The Messianic temple is for the millenial kingdom not eternity! Your methodology of hermeneutics is an impossible tautology! According to you - one cannot understand the...

I tend to believe that, but we cannot prove it. So it could have gotten out by accident and inflicted local damage long before they identified the leak. And China never wanting to admit they are wrong or sloppy could have covered it up. Either way they did let it get out of hand and should...

So what does free masonry and popes have to do with the fact an angel preaches a gospel the church is not commissioned to preach? So everything you have written here is based upon what you think or believe and not empirical fact or rules of grammar. Many people see this passage clearly. will...

Sorry Daniel, but not everything they said and wrote is about Jesus! Jeremiah was a prophet to the peoples! You will never see a prophecy referring to jesus spoken directly and addressing the prophet. That is a modern misuse of allegory.

You are mixing up eternal with immortal- eternal means ever existing. immortal means not dying!

It doesn't say or even imply, sop I won't guess.

But you neglect the fact that simply being born Jewish was enough to enter the kingdom in the minds of Jews! It was a common teaching handed down for generations by the time jesus came! He was disavowing that belief. Paul did the same as well.

So you believe that there will be another "future" command to rebuuild Jerusalem? 24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness...

double preposition- difference in meaning. 1. John did not know of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. 2. John did know of the trials of being a follower 3. Matthew 20:21-23 King James Version 21 And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the...

Well we have an impasse here then. I use much older manuscripts. I do not know which manuscripts this newere version comes from so I cannot determine its accuracy. But once again this passage is part of the contested passages in 1 JOhn 5. got anything else?

no that is you forcing an false understanding to the passage. Jesus said one must be born of the flesh and the spirit. If you read any of the Pauline epistles, you would not have answered the way you did on #1 as for 2 you are saying Jesus was commanding something that had not even come to...

so be it.

he is a form of the definite article "the", what manuscript are you using? also another problem is this passage is one of the contested passages of 1 John. All the oldest manuscripts do not have 6-8 and the textus receptus used manuscripts (if I remember correctly) that had these as sidenotes...

So according to you the actual command to rebuild Jerusalem given to Nehemiah was nothing? WOW talk about allegorically reinterpretingScriptures.

Sorry but that is a direct message to Jeremiah. Jeremiah 1 King James Version 1 The words of Jeremiah the son of Hilkiah, of the priests that were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin: 2 To whom the word of the Lord came in the days of Josiah the son of Amon king of Judah, in the thirteenth...

Well the only symbolic temples we see in SCripture is the body of a believer and Jesus and the Father being the temple in eternity. but as for a Messianic millenial temple there are numerous verses to show it will be a literal verse with literal sacrifices taking place. I have to leave for an...

Yes when it is used symbolically. But no lone has given any real reson to demand that water here be taken symbolically. Though There writings on it I have not found online, two Jewish believers who were devout jews and well learned in 1st century Judaism both agree "being born of water" was a...

Yes but you aresaying being born of water is not the same as being born flesh or splitting the womb. I say that Jesus was telling Nicodemus that it wasn't enough to simply be born a Jew (water/flesh) but He had to become what we now call a spiritual Jew which is the circumcision of the heart.