Search results

That must be the case because they all do that. They will not address our straightforward points and questions with straightforward responses and answers. They never do. That comes across that they have something to hide and they are purposely trying to make scripture say what they want it to...

You can't be taken seriously with this nonsense. Daniel 12:2 is clearly referring to the bodily resurrection of the dead. What else sleeps in the dust of the earth except for dead bodies? Good grief. You are just making scripture say whatever you want it to say. That is obvious.

With a ridiculous analogy, which proved nothing. Why did you avoid addressing my points about how the Hebrew word "rab", translated as "many" in Daniel 12:2 is used in other verses? Are you afraid to address that? Genesis 21:33 And Abraham planted a grove in Beersheba, and called there on the...

LOL. That is exactly what you are doing by saying that Daniel 12:2 says many but not all when it says no such thing. When I show that the Hebrew word translated as "many" there does not mean "many but not all" you just respond with nonsense.

Can you clarify this word salad for us?

Are you reading anything I'm saying, Douggg? Do you think it's honest to make up your own definition of the word generation when interpreting Matthew 24:34? Do you think it's honest to claim that Jesus said He would be taking us to heaven when He said no such thing? You can have that opinion if...

So, you think being a scoffing clown like this is a valid way to address my points? You didn't answer my questions about how the word is used in the examples I gave. Why not? Are you afraid to acknowledge how the word is used in those verses? Do you care that your interpretation of Daniel 12:2...

No, he was not, but what do you think that means exactly in relation to the second coming of Christ? That the rapture will occur 6 days before His second coming? The fact that you are unable to explain your view clearly and in a logical way suggests that you are not telling the truth. What...

That does not say "MANY but not ALL". That is only your assumption. The English word "many" is translated from the Hebrew word "rab" there which does not mean "many but not all". It simply refers to a large number which may or may not refer to all of something. Here's a couple examples where...

Your arguments are extremely weak, so how exactly how our fort been completely destroyed? Certainly not by your weak arguments. Look at what you try to say about Luke 17:26-30? It's utterly ridiculous. You butcher that passage horribly and take it completely out of context. We're supposed to be...

LOL. No one would say they are the same. That is, of course, not what I'm saying. I'm pointing out that Jesus compared both the days of Noah that occurred before the flood came and destroyed all unbelievers and the days of Lot that occurred before fire destroyed Sodom to the days before Christ's...

You're wrong, but let's assume you were right about this for the sake of argument. Are you then claiming that the rapture will occur 6 days before Christ's second coming? What about what Jesus said about the fire coming down on Sodom the very same day that Lot went out of Sodom. Why do you...

Completely agree. And, how convenient of him to not compare what happened with Lot to what will happen when Christ comes as Jesus Himself did. Jesus very clearly indicated that "the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all". And then He...

Give one or two examples of what you're talking about.

Of course you would think that. There's no difference between being mistaken about something and purposely making up his own definition for the word generation to make Matthew 24:34 say what he wants it to say?

You have to be kidding us here. We are the ones who thoroughly exegete scripture and show exactly how we interpret it and why. Read the first few posts in this thread where WPM laid out the amil doctrine thoroughly. Your claim that "there is very little of your doctrine laid out" is ridiculous...

This is not a relevant comparison to you purposely making up new definitions for words to make scripture say what you want it to say and you changing the words of Jesus to make them say what you want them to say.

Who says that it involved "mere days"? Obviously, them being "witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth" would take years and not days. It began on the day of Pentecost, but they obviously did not preach the gospel "unto the...

Why would it not also include OT saints who looked forward to His coming? So, you think the dead in Christ only include NT saints? When Moses and Elijah talked to Him at His transfiguration did He tell them "Sorry, guys, but you won't be inheriting eternal life in the kingdom prepared from the...

Yes. And you are dishonest. Even after being shown that there is no such definition for the word "generation" that you use to apply to "this generation" in Matthew 24:34 (the human life span), you still insist on using your own made up definition for the word. If that isn't dishonest, I don't...