Search results

Great observation! I think it's because they get their identity from the subject under discussion rather than getting their identity through Christ, being a child of God.

No. The trinity is an inherently contradictory concept not found in Scripture.

Yes, Jesus Christ, only man. "Christ" means Anointed. This language usage means he was the passive object acted on by one doing the Anointing. Jesus is chosen by God. He has fixed a day of accountability, when the whole world will be justly evaluated by a new, higher standard: not by a statue...

We'll have to agree to disagree. My take is not the time that Jesus returns but when Israel is born in a day, which we know happened only in 1948.

Trinitarians want to ignore such questions. So, they invoke the fallacy of Diversion, hoping others don’t notice the change in subject or the reasons for it.

He prefers comfortable deception to hard truth. Familiar with his denominations traditions, he accepts their usurpation of Christ’s authority on Earth.

Non-sequitor. Being born again, which I am, does not change the words of God.

That’s all any man has, his humanity.

Jesus’ God is the only God. Genesis begins at Creation. All the Gospels begin with Jesus ministry since that is what they testify about. Trinitarians have to see what is not there because the trinity is not in the Bible. Indeed, it goes against Scripture, particularly the 1C, the Sh’ma, and...

You don’t understand 2 different WHEN’s? When I met my wife is not when we got married and that is not when we had children and not when we got divorced. For some reason, you are demanding that other WHEN’s must coincide with 1948. One saint told me he believes Jesus’ story about the fig tree...

Again, this verse does not even refer to Jesus.

In fact, I KNOW this verse as well as John 1:1 does not even mention Jesus. Think past the fog of lies trinitarians have indoctrinated you with. Just because a verse ‘could’ be interpreted a certain way does not make other interpretations invalid and is far from an explicit teaching. No, the...

Frankly, that is NOT what Scripture says. For him and through him but not by him.

Notice this verse does not even mention Jesus? The idea that Jesus is called Father has no basis in Scripture. All the Gospels are explicit. Jesus is the Son of God. Sons are not their father’s.

Meaning he came into existence. The Bible says Jesus is the first born of all creation. John 3:16 tells us Jesus was made. Begotten means made, created. Look it up.

Bless your heart. Jesus cannot be a son and also always have existed. If you re-read the verses you cite, you will notice the text stops short of saying Jesus is the Creator. Not one single verse identifies Jesus as the LORD God incarnate. Scripture informs us God is Spirit. Jesus is flesh...

Nor do you cite the Scriptures in ‘supporting’ doctrine not found there. The trinity is not in the Bible - not the word and not the doctrine. Jesus manifested as a burning bush? What a hoot. Jesus said his Father is the one true God. According to your doctrine, Jesus doesn’t know what he was...

One almost always goes against what Jesus said. Take ‘speak the truth in love.’ I am way more proficient in speaking the truth in anger. LOL In theory people will say otherwise but actual practice is different from theory. Let’s take another example. Jesus said to love your enemies. I’m more...

No. You are connecting to WHEN’s for reasons I cannot fathom. The WHEN you cite here is ‘when ye see this, your heart shall rejoice’ NOT WHEN the nation is established in a day. Do you deny the day you are born and the day you rejoice do not have to be the same day?

False Alternative. My experience reinforces my belief in what Jesus said.