Search results

That is not talking about the day of judgment that will occur at the last day at the end of the age which John 12:48, Matthew 13:36-43, Matthew 13:47-50, Matthew 25:31-46 and Revelation 20:11-15 are about. Notice that Peter said "the time is come". He was talking in present tense there about...

You only recently found out what Amil is, so it makes no sense for you to immediately dismiss it as you have done. Please try to not act on emotion and reason with us here. It won't kill you. Many people have been amillennialists for a long time just as many have been premillennialists. The...

No, I am not. People who reject His words are not saints, yet you are calling them saints. That makes no sense. This requires an in depth look at that parable in order to understand what Jesus was saying there. It also requires taking other scripture into consideration. Not long before He...

Yes, YOU have been saying that. Jesus never did. Doug, do you actually read anything I say? Have you not seen my explanation for my understanding of the word generation? I see it as a type of people, not a time period. Like in 1 Peter 2:9 where Peter used the word generation to refer to a...

I haven't denied He said that, so you pointing that out is completely pointless and adds nothing of significance to the discussion. I've explained my understanding in Matthew 24:32-34 in detail and did not leave verse 34 out. One thing that I do that you don't do is interpret the word...

That's fine with me. Regarding the topic we're talking about here, you can probably tell I'm fully convinced that he's completely wrong about it. And I'm obviously not afraid to make it clear how I feel about it. What I don't appreciate him doing is misrepresenting my view repeatedly. There's no...

Wrong. Why must you be so ignorant? I believe it is a story about real people in real places, but the rich man's torment is described figuratively. As I have already told you many times. You must have ADD. Jesus likely described that figuratively because it wasn't even possible for Him to...

You really are dense. When did I ever say that? The "Jesuit idea" is that the man of sin is "The Antichrist", an individual bad guy that will show up and sit down in a literal physical temple one day and claim to be God. I do NOT believe that nonsense! Stop lying and misrepresenting my view...

I agree with that and I believe that about myself as well, and yet we still disagree on some things even though we do agree on things that many disagree with us about (interpretation of the Olivet Discourse, mark of the beast, Mystery Babylon, etc.). So, there is really no need to point out that...

As scripture says, the majority is always right. Or...I guess it doesn't say that, does it. I could not possibly care less what those people believed about this. You are completely wasting your time listing all of them. They are all wrong just like you are.

Same here. But, somehow you are superior to me despite the FACT that I also don't follow men's doctrines? I reject many of the doctrines that the church I grew up in held to and I've never been to seminary or anything like that. So, if you would just humble yourself, you will find that...

LOL. I never said I believe in "disembodied soul bodies", you goofball silly person you. I believe that souls and spirits can exist outside the body without the need for a body. Luke 16:19-31 is a true story since it refers to real people and places. It figuratively describes the rich man's...

He was not only referring to the resurrection of the dead, though. He was talking to the Sadducees there who believed, like you, that people have no consciousness after they physically/bodily die. Except they thought people just cease to exist entirely when they physically die. Like you, they...

There's something very, very wrong with you. I specifically told you that I don't believe in that and you still are accusing me of that. What is wrong with you? Seriously. Something's very wrong with you. Why do you lie about me? I do not believe in the future arrival of an individual Man of Sin...

You have even less discernment than I thought, which is really saying something. You completely missed the point. Why do you think that the word generation has only one definition? It doesn't. This is something a young child can understand, yet you can't even understand that the word has...

Look at you and your holier than thou attitude. Unbelievable. No wonder you won't accept that your premillennialist doctrine is false. You are too arrogant to see it. You have been revealed some truths that you foolishly think only you understand. You may have seen that I have agreed with a few...

There's no such thing as "the fig tree generation" except in your imagination. In context, what Jesus was saying there is that His return would be as near as summer is when the fig tree's "branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves" once they would "see all these things" starting to happen...

Premils try to say that He will come to rule over over the kingdoms of the world with a rod of iron. Is that what the following passages are describing? It sure doesn't look like it! Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee...

Are you purposely being obtuse? It was his last post to you before the one where he said it was his last post. Good grief. As for what you said about me, did you not see where I said figurative text does not automatically make a passage a parable? If that was what made something a parable there...

I'm not saying that it does. Where did I ever say that? Nowhere. Learn how to read, please. So, you also foolishly try to create a new definition for the word generation that doesn't exist. Show me a definition of the word generation from any source (any online dictionary or whatever you can...