Search results

LOL. Nice try. If your premillennialist belief was true then you would have no problem addressing the points and answering the questions I asked in post #144. But, you didn't even attempt to do so. That says it all. You think that the following verse is about the judgment of saints. Nothing...

Around the time Christ's death and resurrection. He ascended to heaven shortly after that and Satan had to be cast out before Jesus ascended there since there was no place for him there with Jesus there. It indicates that Satan accused believers before God in heaven day and night before being...

Like I say, you are afraid to address my points, so you don't even try to do so. I can only assume it's because you know you can't, but you want to cling to the false premillennialist doctrine at all costs. It's quite noticeable that you don't even attempt to answer my questions. I wonder why...

LOL. It was his "last post" to you. Is that too difficult for you to understand which one that was?

LOL!!!!!!!!! Keep digging that hole deeper if you insist on making a complete fool of yourself. I said I am NOT a preterist or a futurist. Can you not read? I am NOT waiting for a future man of sin. What other lies do you want to tell about me while making a total fool of yourself? So, there...

If you actually read passages like Matthew 24:9-13, Matthew 24:23-26, 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 and 1 Timothy 4:1-3 you would see that a whole lot of deception, persecution, apostasy and wickedness will occur before Jesus returns which you never say anything about. That says it all about your...

LOL. As if he doesn't know which post he avoided. You even said it was your "last post". How hard is it for him to just look at your last post to him to see which one you were talking about? LOL. The dishonesty of so many people on here is truly unbelievable.

Well, you definitely believe a lot of random things that pop into your head, such as believing that the stars in the sky are angels. LOL!!! Keep the laughs coming. You are good for comic relief on this forum.

LOL! Are you a comedian for a living? You know this scenario doesn't apply to that concept when we're just talking about the use of certain words in scripture and not concepts that were purposely made obscure in the OT and being made clear in the NT such as in Ephesians 3:1-6 which says it was...

Don't bother asking him to do that. He (rebuilder 454) never backs up anything he says with scripture.

LOL!!! That is a lie. It's already been done many times and you still believe everything the same. You continually say things about me that aren't true even after being corrected. What else can I call that but lying? When did I say He is not coming when you think not? Another lie from you. You...

That is YOUR understanding that you have while ignoring the fact that the word has more than one definition. He was talking about a type of people like He did in Matthew 23 where He indicated that "this generation" was even responsible for the death of Abel (Matthew 23:35-36). What does that...

He makes up all kinds of things in his imagination. He also tries to claim that "this generation" refers to a 70 year period of time that began in 1967. He believes it's a 70 year period of time because he thinks that Psalm 90:10 defines the duration of a generation, which is utterly ridiculous...

So, why do you call it "the fig tree generation" then? Yes, the parable related directly to what He said in verse 33 where He said when they saw all these things starting to come to pass, His return would be near. But, that does not include Matthew 24:15-21 which is about what happened in 70 AD.

Right. That will be on the day of His second coming. Did I say otherwise? No. Now, can you answer my questions for once instead of avoiding them? When will the dead be judged? Does it not indicate in Revelation 11:15-18 that the seventh trumpet signals that God's wrath "has come, and the time...

Jesus made no mention of "the fig tree generation". You continue to make things up in your imagination. You are impossible to take seriously. The parable related to how soon Christ's return would be and not to any "fig tree generation". Good grief. LOL. Unreal.

Context is not something you ever think or care about. The context is no flesh in Judea since Jesus said those in Judea would need to flee.

No idea what you're talking about. Clearly, there is no need to be taken out of the world in order to be kept from temptation and evil. That is obvious. So, to try and say otherwise is just ridiculous. No, it hinges on your active imagination that contradicts the written word of God. I do my...

A fruitful discussion involves each person addressing the other's points. So far, you are not addressing mine at all. Yes, I believe that Jesus is YHWH, the Lord God of Israel. But, that proves nothing as it relates to this discussion. Are the references that John the Baptist made to Jesus...

Goodness gracious. Of course I agree with that. Don't talk to me like I'm some child who just started reading the Bible. I have been studying scripture in depth for many years. I understand that is your opinion and why you see it as you do. But, when John the Baptist called Jesus "The Lamb of...