Search results

Why are you expecting something different in fulfillment of God's promise to Abraham than what Abraham himself was looking for? Hebrews 11:8 By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither...

Looks like he is mistaken about who is not believing the word of God. That would be him. How much more clear can that verse be? Yet, this lying hypocrite tailgator denies what it so clearly says.

Satan has deceived many with that nonsense. He does anything he can to get people's focus off of the God of the universe, Jesus Christ.

You mean like you reject Paul's words in 1 Corinthians 15:20-23? You reject Paul's teaching because you think he didn't have the full revelation of Bible prophecy. That is what you have said. You are a false teacher that no one can trust.

Dispensationalists think more about Israel than they do about Jesus Christ and His church. Their focus is completely off base. It makes me wonder how close their personal relationship with Him can be when they focus so much on the wrong things. I would compare them to Lazarus's sister Martha...

Oh, so you're saying the following scripture is false then? Hebrews 8:6 But in fact the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, since the new covenant is established on better promises. 7 For if there had been...

Nothing more needs to be said in response to that post. I don't know if you're aware, but tailgator has a lot of nonsensical beliefs. I showed him the order of bodily resurrections unto bodily immortality in 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 and he dismissed it because he said Paul didn't have the full...

Your way of thinking baffles me to no end. If you accuse someone of rejecting the words of the Lord, the implication is that the person knows for certain what the Lord is saying and rejects it, anyway. Is that what you think I'm doing? Of course not! None of us do that. I would never accuse...

I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt on that, but you very well may be right. Either way, it's obviously a complete waste of time trying to engage in discussion with him.

Paul gave the order of bodily resurrections unto bodily immortality in 1 Corinthians 15:20-23. He said Christ's was first and next in order are those who belong to Christ at His second coming. That's it. If you don't accept that then that's on you. We're just repeating ourselves at this point...

Doug, you have a serious reading comprehension problem. I very specifically said "prophetic beasts" are kingdoms as Daniel 7:23 shows. Is Daniel 7:23 in your Bible, Doug? Is that a prophetic beast? No. So, that isn't what I'm talking about. If I told you 1 + 1 = 2, I am certain you would try to...

Wrong. You are completely ignoring what He said in verse 33, which explains why He told the parable. He told the parable to give people an idea of how soon His return would be after they saw "all these things" come to pass. That's it. Identifying the fig tree has nothing to do with the point He...

Wrong. Verse 33 shows what His parable was about. He told it to give an indication of how near His return would be when "ye shall see all these things". It will be as near as summer is when a fig tree "is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves". This generation refers to the Jewish people. They...

LOL. So what? I'm not even saying that it's wrong for the word to be translated as "generation". The English word "generation" has multiple definitions just like the Greek word it's translated from (genea), so what you're saying proves nothing.

Prophetic beasts are kingdoms, Doug. Why will you not accept this? Daniel 7:23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. The beast is...

I can do this all day. Yes, you are. Again, Paul said Jesus Himself is the firstfruits and you are not accepting that and trying to say that the 144,000 are the firstfruits, thereby contradicting Paul. I'm sensing that you have a low opinion of Paul and don't think he knew what he was talking...

You took him out of context. He was not saying that believing in premil means you are in a cult, he was saying that the cults believe in premil just as some Christians do. That's all he was saying. As usual, you misunderstood what he was saying because you either have terrible reading...

He is completely wrong, as always, but why are you saying that verse involves the 42 months? What do you mean by that? The two witnesses are said to witness for 1,260 days (Rev 11:3) which is equivalent to 42 months (assuming each month is 30 days). It's after the 1,260 days/42 months are over...

I'm not changing anything. The Greek word can mean "firstfruits" or "firstfruit". The Bible wasn't written in English. But, the point is that it very specifically refers to Jesus Himself as being the firstfruit or firstfruits of them that slept and it does not say that them that slept are the...

LOL. Jesus will have already descended from heaven at that point. What do you think, that He will just hang around up there in the air for some period of time after the trumpet of God sounds? No, that is referring to the day of His return. It's not talking about the trumpet of God sounding to...