Search results

Because you did. Jesus is not God. One way we know this is only God is referred to as the LORD. While there are many lords in the Bible, no lord is called God. Other languages make the same point. Only by pretending YWH and Yeshua are synonyms is the false doctrine supported. The proof text is...

Why are you on this forum?

The action Abraham took to demonstrate his faith took place much earlier when he was left his land and went to the Promised Land. No one is justified by their work. IMO, we are confusing our 21st century engineering definition of work with the Biblical term ‘works.’ ‘Works’ serve your glory...

I speak English. I am griot. You have no argument in any language. Changing the language does not change the argument. Pure diversion.

I couldn't help but notice you did not actually quote Scripture. I recall Abraham being known as the Father of Faith, not belief. Faith has action. Belief does not. Abraham acted in faith by going to the promised land. We are not made right by God by believing lip service style. Real faith has...

In the book by Rubenstein When Jesus Became God, he explains it was just a smoke screen, an after-thought to the real passion of the 4th century, the man-is-god thesis. Still true today. Few trinitarians exert much time and energy defending how there are 2 Spirits, Father and HS. In another...

My favorite quote from John Wesley. My church defines faith = belief + action. Real faith has action. However, 'works' in the Bible refer to self-aggrandizement, working not for the glory of God. Scripture says no man can brag in being saved. So, I see harmony between Paul and James. Real...

theefaith may not have realized how he destroyed his doctrine when invoking The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not. (2 Cor 11:31). NOTE: No mention of a 3rd being, a distinct person of HS because the Apostles were not trinitarians.

Again, in modern parlance, Heb 1:8,9 reads you will sit forever on the throne of God. Not the same as who sits on it IS God. See the difference? I doubt it.

What is given is AND. God and Father. This is not the same as God the Father. It is the same as God alone is the father alone.

You mean the corrupted text, not found in the original manuscript, which simply read, "in my name?"

NOTE: This text settles the fact that trinitarianism is bunk. It does not say God the father but God (in his unitarian nature) AND Father of JC. See the difference? I doubt it.

It is so funny how they react to the obvious contradictions of their doctrine. Here, total denial. The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. Luke 1:35

Absolutely not! You've lost the argument when you have to retreat to a foreign language. LORD - YWH Jesus - not ever referred to as YWH but Yeshua.

Not sure how you reach this. Prophets and angels speak for God but are not God.

That's why I started this thread.

A video I watched several months ago rhetorically asked this question. While it is absurd to suppose "the Father" is not THE Father of Jesus, Scripture is crystal clear it was the Holy Spirit. So, on what basis does one answer the question?

No. There are many lords. God is not a lord but the LORD. Nowhere in Scripture is Jesus referred to as the LORD, only Lord, like many others in the Bible. You do discern the difference, right?

I like it but don't understand how Adventist ties us to the Redeemer?

Agreed. Jesus is one of many lords in the Bible. Jesus is lord but not the LORD God almighty, our Father.