Search results

Doug, your reasoning is complete nonsense. Should we interpret any references in scripture to the church as not relating to us since they were made directly to the church existing at that time? Or should we understand that any messages directed to the church at that time still apply today? Your...

More nonsense. The heads of the beast represent kingdoms and kings, but prophet beasts always represent kingdoms. You never use scripture to interpret scripture while being careful to avoid contradictions or conclusions that are pure nonsense. Instead, you try to force unrelated scripture to...

That's complete nonsense that is just a fabrication of your own wild imagination. The beast isn't a king. Prophetic beasts are kingdoms. Daniel 7:23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole...

That is talking about the same thing. The ones who were blinded were broken off. The kingdom of God was taken from them (Matthew 21:43-45). But, as Paul indicated in verses 14 and 23, they were not blinded permanently. Some of them later became saved. Romans 11:14 If by any means I may provoke...

Yes, that is referring to the second coming of Christ with verse 31 referring to the church being gathered to Christ when He comes. The point I'm making is that unbelievers will be wailing in fear when He comes and that is the context of Matthew 24:30 and Revelation 1:7. In contrast, Zechariah...

Pay attention to what I'm saying. Do you even try to understand what people are saying to you? What I said is that Paul indicated that the blindness of SOME of them was removed in his day. Okay? Is that not what he indicated in Romans 11:11-14? It clearly is. Are you with me so far or has your...

You continue to make things up that John didn't say. Nowhere did he reference a singular Antichrist, but rather he referenced many antichrists who all were influenced by "that spirit of antichrist". You repeatedly try to twist scripture to make it say what you want it to say and it's disturbing...

I'm not sure if you interpret even one single verse relating to end times correctly. You just get everything wrong. Over and over again. That is not talking about a chronological generation. Good grief, Doug. Open your spiritual eyes. Do you somehow not know that the New Testament was written in...

Did you just ignore it when I said this, Doug: They did not hear that an individual antichrist was coming, they heard "that spirit of antichrist" was coming which all antichrists have. 1 John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and...

If they deny Christ, they are. As you always do, you are making something simple complicated instead. To be antichrist means you are against Christ and deny Christ. Very simple. Jesus Himself said this: Matthew 12:30 He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me...

That's a minor miracle in itself, regardless of whether you agree or not. That's not what you were saying before. You were saying they were formerly Christians and then left John's church, his circle of Christians or whatever it was that comprised the "us" that John was talking about. Nope...

Revelation 11:8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. Other than the fact that Jesus was not crucified in Jerusalem (John 19:20, Hebrews 13:12), another thing to notice is that the great...

Doug, you're just wrong about everything. When was the kingdom of God taken from the chief priests, elders and Pharisees that Jesus was talking to? After Christ's death and resurrection. That's when they were cut off (see Romans 11). Who became part of the kingdom of God after that who were...

Nope. This is just doctrinally biased nonsense. John made it clear that ANYONE who denies Christ is an antichrist and he said there were MANY antichrists, so to say he was talking about an individual antichrist is to take him completely out of context. They did not hear that an individual...

It's true that those who went out from John and his church or circle of Christians were antichrists, but it's not true that they were formerly Christians. John very specifically said "they were not of us". And he didn't say they ever were "of us". If they were "of us", John said "they would no...

All you need to do is read the surrounding verses to see that. Very simple. Who was Jesus talking to there? He started talking to them here: Matthew 21:23 And when he was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what...

Why don't you allow scripture to tell you what "antichrist" means? It doesn't mean "to take the place of Christ". That might describe the false Christs that Jesus warned about (Matthew 24:24), but it's not what the term "antichrist" means. 1 John 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that...

I'll give him a hint. The correct answer is Daniel. Now, watch, he'll still get it wrong.

What a blatant, outright lie! This is complete foolishness! An absolutely shameful butchering of scripture. It says He would be cut off AFTER the end of the first 69 weeks, not that end of the 69th week. What a blatant lie. A clear case of making scripture say what you want it to say. You are so...

Agree. It doesn't get much worse than attributing a prophecy about Jesus Christ to some "Antichrist" instead the way he and many others do.